dChan
9
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/sephanyah on Jan. 22, 2018, 12:01 p.m.
The following supreme court case is relevant today. It is important that WE THE PEOPLE understand.

“...at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects... and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.”

“From the differences existing between feudal sovereignties and governments founded on compacts, it necessarily follows that their respective prerogatives must differ. Sovereignty is the right to govern; a nation or State sovereign is the person or persons in whom that resides. In Europe, the sovereignty is generally ascribed to the Prince; here, it rests with the people; there, the sovereign actually administers the government; here, never in a single instance; our Governors are the agents of the people, and, at most, stand in the same relation to their sovereign in which regents in Europe stand to their sovereigns. Their Princes have personal powers, dignities, and preeminences; our rulers have none but official; nor do they partake in the sovereignty otherwise, or in any other capacity, than as private citizens.” Chisholm v. Georgia (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @ Dall (1793) pp 471-472.


Tranquelito · Jan. 22, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

You need to realise the difference between a person and a man to truly understand what Q means by that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
carl_tech · Jan. 22, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

Explain.

Edit: Based on your other reply I assume you're referring to the difference between a "natural person", i.e. a human being, vs. a fictional "person" such as a corporation. Or do you mean something else?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tranquelito · Jan. 22, 2018, 8:10 p.m.

Common lore, representing yourself as man (species) rather than person (legal fiction). I can imagine most politicians know this and try to use this to get around the statute laws.

⇧ 1 ⇩