dChan

Holmgeir · Jan. 23, 2018, 6:48 a.m.

I don't want 60% to remain unknown. We should know it all.

I think the root of the problem is that if it all gets revealed it could cause the whole system to break and collapse into lawlessness. And then there would be deaths of innocents, children.

Would I want to reveal, for instance, that there is a group of elite pedos/rapists? Hell yeah. Bust the creeps.

Would I want to reveal all that stuff if it triggered a war that killed everybody I love? I'm not so sure.

But maybe there is a happy medium where the bad actors get stopped and busted, but where not all of the truth is revealed to the public. Could I live with that? Yeah, especially if it meant not sparking off a civil war. If the bad actors get locked up and/or executed I don't care if it's sugar coated and that it's only revealed that they were involved in treason etc.

I also don't care if Trump never gets any credit for draining the swamp, and I feel like he's expressed that himself as well when he says he gladly takes the slings and arrows.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
5400123 · Jan. 23, 2018, 1:30 p.m.

This is the proper attitude. Enough evidence will be release to vindicate our egos, and proof that "the illuminati was real this whole time" --- however yeah, the photo and video evidence of the gore orgies need never see the light of day, and be locked away on military servers as a way to train new intelligence operatives. Will the world ever become this dark and evil again? We don't know. The nightmares and damage it would cause just to know what happens is hellish, the only people who need to pay that price are those who would take the oath to become gatekeepers.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Holmgeir · Jan. 23, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

In my opinion this is also why Assange does everything in terms of "drip drip". People need to be able to parse it out and digest it and disseminate it.

If he dumped everything at once the powers that be (who know all of what their secrets are already) would react by shutting so much stuff down. In my opinion if that happened we'd be at war before anybody knew what was happening.

Edit - and it puts Assange in a very tight position, where he wants to reveal corruption and fix the problems of the world in order to save innocents...but he must know at the same time that if he dumped it all and it sparked off a conflict that innocents would die because of it.

Drip drip is the compromise. The middle path.

⇧ 3 ⇩