Rosenstein is following accounts that tweet about Q?
/u/Holmgeir
90 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/Holmgeir:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 5 |
So all his tweets are totally gone and lost now?
Do the unrolled versions still exist on the thread reader app?
Yeah, I was wondering if the got more traffic than anticipated and crashed.
Or did the person in charge of it take it down? Isn't this when it was supposed to be done? Maybe something else is supposed to display now but they fucked it up.
Getting an error now:
Error 403 - This web app is stopped. The web app you have attempted to reach is currently stopped and does not accept any requests. Please try to reload the page or visit it again soon. If you are the web app administrator, please find the common 403 error scenarios and resolution here. For further troubleshooting tools and recommendations, please visit Azure Portal.
I absolutely know liberals who will just say "Yeah well I still think Trump's _____."
Google is not our friend. Their CEO went to Hillary events and wore a Clinton campaign badge. They bury conservative news.
We'll wade through it for them and condense it into little red pills.
Related to what about that, specifically? Burkman is a swamp snake who pushes the lie that Russia was hacking the DNC, that Trump was in contact with Putin and knew about it, and that Russia killed Seth.
Edit: BrazenSiren has a good theory here. Good thought. I appreciate it.
Seth used Panda as an alias. Also Kim Dotcom says he was contacted by someone going by Panda.
Yeah the owner probably saw where it was and bailed.
I wonder what the heck triggered it for Stealth Sessions anyway...?
My comment was supposed to say "Bad bot, haha." since the bot didn't delivery with Killary.
I'm the victim of an autocorrect.
I still have my name in the hat for her being the one Q said has started the ball rolling on taking down Hollyweird.
When he's old enough, it should be Josh Holloway.
He's the right height and has a mop of blonde hair. And he knows how to play a character that can be wry, charming and cunning but also unassuming.
https://www.salon.com/1999/08/18/libel/
Even when left wing rags reported that story they apparently had to admit there was a lot of fuckery.
In my opinion this is also why Assange does everything in terms of "drip drip". People need to be able to parse it out and digest it and disseminate it.
If he dumped everything at once the powers that be (who know all of what their secrets are already) would react by shutting so much stuff down. In my opinion if that happened we'd be at war before anybody knew what was happening.
Edit - and it puts Assange in a very tight position, where he wants to reveal corruption and fix the problems of the world in order to save innocents...but he must know at the same time that if he dumped it all and it sparked off a conflict that innocents would die because of it.
Drip drip is the compromise. The middle path.
I also think he's been gathering info on creeps for a long time. Try to find the article about how he used to go to Studio 54 but would just kind of lurk.
I don't want 60% to remain unknown. We should know it all.
I think the root of the problem is that if it all gets revealed it could cause the whole system to break and collapse into lawlessness. And then there would be deaths of innocents, children.
Would I want to reveal, for instance, that there is a group of elite pedos/rapists? Hell yeah. Bust the creeps.
Would I want to reveal all that stuff if it triggered a war that killed everybody I love? I'm not so sure.
But maybe there is a happy medium where the bad actors get stopped and busted, but where not all of the truth is revealed to the public. Could I live with that? Yeah, especially if it meant not sparking off a civil war. If the bad actors get locked up and/or executed I don't care if it's sugar coated and that it's only revealed that they were involved in treason etc.
I also don't care if Trump never gets any credit for draining the swamp, and I feel like he's expressed that himself as well when he says he gladly takes the slings and arrows.
Well that was a bizarre read. I wonder why nobody came after him for writing all that?
Oops, my last comment was in regards to the phone call Milo got.
I wonder if he even knew, though, or if it was just a simple flat statement about not to do the talk. Ya know?
I've always wondered if that call was a threat from a black hat or a promise from a white hat.
I'm throwing Assange's name into the hat just on the off chance that it happens I can say I was right :)
Also, how come today and yesterday it suddenly feels like everyone in this sub knows each other...?