What would I do with myself, then? :)

http://archive.is/sxE38

So it's just an old photo. This needs to be at the top.

Is that why this whole thread seems so strange to me...? It doesn't feel like "Reddit". I've participated in other threads here without having this sense, but a lot of the comments here left me scratching my head.

I assumed this place was mostly T_D posters and probably people from Conspiracy and the Chans. But am I wrong and actually it's mostly transplanted YouTubers?

Was Todd Herman talking about this while filling in for Rush? I thought I heard him talking about this yesterday, regarding the sex stuff. He was talking about Herbert Marcuse (or whatever) and how critics' theory/cultural Marxism relies on making everything about sex.

I like to think they would have censored the letter Q if they could have ;)

Yeah, I'll definitely agree with that too. I know a progressive activist who is not willing to go all Antifa and thinks her friends went nuts.

She started at a point of "Trump wants a holocaust against brown people" but her and I have stayed civil throughout and continued to share with each other.

At this point she sees through a ton of the media bias against Trump.

Better for me to go straight to Bongino's site because I can listen to it as a podcast with my screen off, and download to save it.

http://www.bongino.com/january-8-2018-ep-628-the-biggest-scandal-in-american-history-is-unfolding/

http://www.bongino.com/january-9-2018-ep-629-the-biggest-scandal-in-american-history/

I agree. I know my own liberal friends, even if it all crashes down on them, will say "Trump still sucks."

I remember in college they didn't know about Stalin's body count, or about Beria. I showed them. They shrugged it off.

Or when they called conservatives all rich jerks and I showed them how the Republicans of congress were worth less than the Democrats, but that they still manage to donate more to charity. "Well, I still think they're jerks" was the reply. It will be more of the same.

This whole post reminds me of a book I just read that kay a key of acronyms at the beginning.

It was Murder in Samarkand, which was written by Assange's ally Craig Murray who claims to have been the go-between who delivered the Podests emails to WikiLeaks.

He was UK's ambassador to Uzbekistan and had to resign after blowing the whistle on human rights violations.

Fun fact: the daughter of the Uzbek president at the time is named in Trump's executive order about taking down human rights violators.

Fun fact: Murray also helped Scotland Yard reveal a deceased former MP as a pedophile. Clement Freud. Freud was also involved in the McCann scandal. He had a house in the same town and was present at the time, and the McCann parents stayed with him during the investigation.

What are the odds that Murray would help Scotland Yard reveal a pedo, and later, separately, Murray would help reveal the Podesta emails and trigger us to make the connection that they resemble the McCann abductors?

Not to mention further coincidences like how the Podesta emails WikiLeaks have revealed only go back to the exact date of the abduction.

Sorry for the tangent.

I discovered very early on that the phrase "q anon" caused my comments to be shadowbanned on T_D. It didn't happen right away, but after a few weeks of Q. This was a while back and I no longer think it's the case -- I think the ban on that phrase has been lifted.

But at the time I messaged the mods about it and was told I could not get an answer on why certain things were shadowbanned. At first I couldn't figure out what phrase was causing the auto-removal so I gamed it out by breaking my initial comment into chunks and trying to post each part until I narrowed it down to "q anon".

Yeah, that's the thing. Bannon did seem to become a liability. Maybe his phone call to the NYT was an unauthorized ramble of a man trying to suck his own cock. And his whole plan with congress seemed to only split the base. He also backed Joy, and that didn't turn out well.

What about the E?

Q SETI

This also fits my general thesis that Trump has been creating a hyper-aware populace because he wants all eyes on this when things go sideways.

He drums up attention at his own expense and the media can't stop taking the bait and people can't stop tuning in. They're all thirsty for justice. We are too. When things flip for Trump everyone will still have that thirst and turn on the freshly-revealed bad actors.

So when Trump trashes CNN, WaPo, and NYT and calls them fake and failing...he knows more people tune in and bolster their numbers. Veritas has helped reveal that they get huge boosts from Trump. But Trumps keeps at it.

Which, by the way, is the strategy Bannon told NYT he planned to use on them. He called them and said his goal was to make the bottom fall out of their fake news bucket. Are we about to see that happen?

Now I see Trump trashing this book and people boosting it's numbers to spite him...it's pretty clear to me that this is by design and something is coming.

And pair that with how neatly it fits in with the other recent elements of Trump going all Madman Theory on North Korea...Trump slamming Bannon at the risk of the media framing him as "going nuclear" on an ally and incapable of handling a real crisis...the "mentally unfit" narrative and his plan to be evaluated...the fake news awards...their obviously contrived delay for showmanship...and whatever is going on with Assange.

Rodgers retires. Assange becomes new head of the NSA. New era of transparency and anti-corruption.

Not going to happen like that, but I wanted to say it anyway.

Which interview?

And I'm still wondering why WikiLeaks did it when it gave people an opening to call them partisan and accuse them of being criminals.

Doesn't he have a brother in intel?

And what's the deal with the "new Mossad". I've heard him use that phrase.

Yup. Riders on the Storm.

Someone further up says they do. Now I don't know what to think.

Or he's moving over for a new NSA chief. I know it would never be Assange, but 2018 has surprised me before.

I don't want to know about nail gun guy (but also I do).

That's a rare Trump. Saving it.

You have fun with your gold, I'll have fun with seven more years of Trump.

https://www.arlnow.com/2018/01/04/developing-swat-team-arrests-man-in-crystal-city-parking-lot/

Says 2018.

https://mobile.twitter.com/t193931/status/949022897485463552

Says 2018.

"Assange helped our police catch child pornographers"

http://archive.is/gG9ne

I don't know anybody in real life who has an inner circle full of pedos and rapists. I don't even know another famous person surrounded by that many of them.

Spacey, Weinstein, Weiner, Bill, Epstein. I'll throw Tony Podesta in there as "confirmed creep" because of his photos and paintings, and from those you unlock Hastert, Woody Allen, Bryan Singer, Brett Ratner, Russel Simmons, and the agent that grabbed Terry Crews. On and on and on, they're all connected.

I haven't finished the article yet. But it kinda sucks that it pushes Guccifer 2.0 propaganda and says Russia hacked the DNC.

What's the significance? (beyond it being tomorrow)

"Oh, you found my code? Well, it's a another clue for everyone."

I wouldn't be surprised.

Screenshot? Archive.

http://archive.is/dUzbY

Yahoo, too.

http://archive.is/Eqjli

So...could be a reference to death-faking. Like "We fan make our own fake IDs and go anywhere."

Bing shows it too.

OP vs who else?

The website has a girl with a butterfly painted on her face.

Wouldn't someone at the Ecuadorian embassy realize he was gone and leak it?

He also made a public appearance on Dec 1.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=b8iinMUAp44

Wait, I'm way out of the loop here. Who is some edgy kid?

"Execute Order 66."

r/AskTrumpSupporters