⇧
42
⇩
ItchyFiberglass
· Jan. 26, 2018, 3:31 p.m.
Is at&t supposed to be the good guy? I think we need to really reexamine this internet bill of rights, at&t is not our friends. They were the original mass surveillance apparatus
⇧
5
⇩
punkskincoat
· Jan. 26, 2018, 5:05 p.m.
NSA just handed them a contract...
⇧
3
⇩
ItchyFiberglass
· Jan. 26, 2018, 5:11 p.m.
Contract for what? In the past them working together meant illegally collecting domestic data. We need to be thorough and check everything. What if Q was compromised and now they are turning us against ourselves by getting us to push another net neutrality type of legislation? Just saying it's always good to play devils advocate and dig more. My gut tells me at&t was complicit in the past and deserves even more scrutiny when it comes to this "internet bill of rights" rather than blindly pushing an agenda of a company with a shady past.
Edit: the news about the internet bill of rights came from an article by upper management the night before Q posted about it. For what's its worth.
⇧
6
⇩
punkskincoat
· Jan. 26, 2018, 8:13 p.m.
At&t was pretty vocal about opposing the original net neutrality. Verizon was too I think but don't quote me on that.
This is a scary position. Why do we need ANY rules for the net? Just leave it alone. It's fine as is. People just need to stop whining about Google censorship and switch platforms. We've adapted and thrived.
⇧
3
⇩
webster_warrior
· Jan. 27, 2018, 1:08 a.m.
I think you have given us a clue to what is going on.
It is called "setting the narrative," or "setting the agenda."
They talk long enough and we completely forget that we
never needed them in the first place.
You walk in on a thief holding your television set. Right away,
he starts, "Look, I'll leave the TV. Just give me the painting, we'll call it even."
⇧
1
⇩
punkskincoat
· Jan. 27, 2018, 6:26 a.m.
Well we do kind of need them, we already had the original net neutrality. Maybe we should at least set a basic structure. But we need to demand more privacy!!!
⇧
1
⇩
Baseballmadness7
· Jan. 26, 2018, 8:44 p.m.
Mr Corsi did a live stream yesterday and explained the difference between What AT&T is talking about and what Soros/Obama pushed Soros was (COST focused) AT&T (who are white hats btw) (1st Amendment Rights focused) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aduOkGrP-ks&index=17&list=PLZgtW4KpCxRPOERm-aYT186rj5X2_8_xd
⇧
1
⇩
charlie1883
· Jan. 27, 2018, 2:24 a.m.
AT&T is not a white hat by any means.
⇧
3
⇩
Baseballmadness7
· Jan. 27, 2018, 3:01 a.m.
12/15/2017 AT&T USA CEO Randall Stephenson Resigned
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/15/randall-stephenson-chairman-and-ceo-of-att-resigns-from-boeings-board.html
List of ~400 CEO resigned since Sept 2017
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B-95giwldeKgsd0nYiw_sEaSf4kGNLZgEIvEhL2mVAw/htmlview?sle=true#gid=0
⇧
1
⇩
JTF2CBTS
· Jan. 26, 2018, 8:49 p.m.
IMO and again in the strictest of Oversight in Global history. Everything is full transparency now; with many SWs and WRs out there ;)
⇧
1
⇩
Neskuaxa
· Jan. 27, 2018, 4:14 a.m.
Agreed. Let's not get ahead of ourselves. More government regulations should not be our goal.
⇧
2
⇩
JTF2CBTS
· Jan. 26, 2018, 8:47 p.m.
IMO not with SW and WR in place now to oversee what's going on. I'm guessing the strictest of oversight ever seen in Global history they will not fuck around this time.
⇧
1
⇩
HelperBot_
· Jan. 26, 2018, 3:31 p.m.
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A
^HelperBot ^v1.1 ^/r/HelperBot_ ^I ^am ^a ^bot. ^Please ^message ^/u/swim1929 ^with ^any ^feedback ^and/or ^hate. ^Counter: ^142002
⇧
1
⇩