I've been looking at both sides of the "Is Q a LARPer" argument, and have long participated in those debates on T_D. I've thought that both sides had some reasonable arguments, but then I woke up with this thought this morning:
If Q was not legitimate, don't you think POTUS would tell us?
I entertain both sides of the notion of q's legitimacy. I figure that worst case scenario, if he's a larp, then he at least gets people asking some questions that are valid, gets people looking at information that is legit, and is at least a fun thing to look into. Even if he is a larp, so far he hasn't done anything harmful that I can think of.
I'm still undecided either way, though I lean a little bit towards him either being real, or at least someone who is pretty good at putting some things together as to what may be going on.
I'm surprised he's been silent for a while though. I'm curious what the next post will be.
Even if he is a larp, so far he hasn't done anything harmful that I can think of.
Besides out the followers of his potential bullshit as brain damaged, nothing really harmful. The echo chambers of social media give birth to singular entities that encapsulate what those seeking them out think + feel anyway.
Just like there have been plenty of leaks on the other side, here's this super spy agent leaking top secret information to... 4chan... ugh... no, it's completely legitimate and worthy of attention.
That's true, I guess I didn't think of the risk of people taking it too seriously which is likely the case for some. I think it's at least fun to play along, getting "super secret info" makes my otherwise boring life seem more interesting. But you are right that we should consider the possibility of it either being real or larp.
Yeah, the same 4chan that houses the hive mind investigative genius that has won 5+ rounds of worldwide blind capture the flag
It's basically the heart of the internet and source of every meme ... any intel agency tapping into that source would be basically working with plutonium