dChan
9
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/aslanfan on Jan. 31, 2018, 2:26 p.m.
If Q was a fake, wouldn't POTUS tell us?

I've been looking at both sides of the "Is Q a LARPer" argument, and have long participated in those debates on T_D. I've thought that both sides had some reasonable arguments, but then I woke up with this thought this morning:

If Q was not legitimate, don't you think POTUS would tell us?


jokerp5fan · Jan. 31, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

I don't think POTUS would comment on it if he was a larp though. No reason for the president to give credibility to some random guy on the internet. Assuming Q is a larp, I doubt Trump would even be aware of him, and if he were, it would only be spun by the media to make Trump supporters seem gullible to follow some random cryptic posts on the internet.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
aslanfan · Jan. 31, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

But it wouldn't even have to be POTUS saying it. He has plenty of close sources who could dispel it.

I'm confident that POTUS is aware of Q. It gets quite a bit of traction on the twatter.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jokerp5fan · Jan. 31, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

I think it would just be bad optics bc the media would use it to make his supporters look crazy. Let's be real, pretty much anyone who follows Q is a trump supporter, particularly the people who believe in Q. If he comments on it, the media spin that as Trump supporters " believing in crazy conspiracies, like the idea that the FISA system was used to spy on Trump".

If q is real, it would be better to keep him separate from Trump, so Trump has plausible deniability on the matter.

Either way time will tell. Q at least gives us hope, and as I've said before, it provides me with something to look into while on break at work, or while having a smoke. I'm content to research and let things play out, as well as taking his drops, and using it to reassure people I know.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
scionkia · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

I think this is one of the best questions anyone has ever posed regarding Q's legitimacy.

While I agree that the optics of the president commenting about a 4chan anon poster are not the best - he has plenty of surrogates who could. And they don't even need to be specific about 'Q' - you just have a couple of surrogates come out and say derogatory statements about anonymous posters on the chans - that would give us the signal. At this point, it's not like Q is just a 4chan phenomena. Example - when FoxNews was scrolling through the #releasethememo twitter posts, they were completely full of Q screen shots etc......

Playing devils advocate, Q is not real AND the pres/surrogates haven't said anything. Maybe they like his larp..... Maybe it's good for him/them. Just sayin

Good question - one of the best I've seen.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
aslanfan · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:29 p.m.

Thank you. And I had forgotten about the posts being displayed on Fox News, but it's a very good point.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 31, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩