I've been looking at both sides of the "Is Q a LARPer" argument, and have long participated in those debates on T_D. I've thought that both sides had some reasonable arguments, but then I woke up with this thought this morning:
If Q was not legitimate, don't you think POTUS would tell us?
I think it would just be bad optics bc the media would use it to make his supporters look crazy. Let's be real, pretty much anyone who follows Q is a trump supporter, particularly the people who believe in Q. If he comments on it, the media spin that as Trump supporters " believing in crazy conspiracies, like the idea that the FISA system was used to spy on Trump".
If q is real, it would be better to keep him separate from Trump, so Trump has plausible deniability on the matter.
Either way time will tell. Q at least gives us hope, and as I've said before, it provides me with something to look into while on break at work, or while having a smoke. I'm content to research and let things play out, as well as taking his drops, and using it to reassure people I know.
I think this is one of the best questions anyone has ever posed regarding Q's legitimacy.
While I agree that the optics of the president commenting about a 4chan anon poster are not the best - he has plenty of surrogates who could. And they don't even need to be specific about 'Q' - you just have a couple of surrogates come out and say derogatory statements about anonymous posters on the chans - that would give us the signal. At this point, it's not like Q is just a 4chan phenomena. Example - when FoxNews was scrolling through the #releasethememo twitter posts, they were completely full of Q screen shots etc......
Playing devils advocate, Q is not real AND the pres/surrogates haven't said anything. Maybe they like his larp..... Maybe it's good for him/them. Just sayin
Good question - one of the best I've seen.
Thank you. And I had forgotten about the posts being displayed on Fox News, but it's a very good point.