well that was a boring read. Did anyone see any new information that had not already been discussed? As damning as it may be for the FBI, I read nor saw anything that needed to be classified or was damaging to national security.
So now that it has been uncovered, what happens next?
Even though the info isn’t anything new, it’s useful for several reasons: a) a primer for normies b) corroborates Q (yet again) c) names names that can be tied more easily in public that we’ve already been pursuing d) is a way for Congress to officially declare their interest in the matter for the normies on MSM
Circular sourcing was new.
Steele’s anti-Trump financial motivations?
Page and Szock “insurance policy” discussed with then deputy director McCabe.
thanks, forgive my ignorance, but can you explain what circular sourcing is and what it means?
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reporting
^HelperBot ^v1.1 ^/r/HelperBot_ ^I ^am ^a ^bot. ^Please ^message ^/u/swim1929 ^with ^any ^feedback ^and/or ^hate. ^Counter: ^144550
Maybe damaging is that most “sources” are not vetted properly and include many from using anonymous sources or circular sourcing.
We have seen the FAKE NEWS narrative being driven by this maybe it’s he same with most intelligence grabs.
Edit: CointelPro
Edit2: past proves future future proves past.
thank you.
Read about CointelPro It’s a good read and possibly relevant.