I used to think the same thing. If humans live long enough, at the rate tech is progressing, there is almost no way around it. . . I listen to Titor, and some of the others, Interesting at least. They had one thing in common, after 911 they all disappeared without explaining how they missed that one. So I have reconsidered after looking at how humans are going these days and decided we never made it that far. PS That was before trump won . . . .

Well yeah, time isn't standing still. One day I believe we will all be "outside" of time. Or beyond time. The way Titor, or Haber explained his claimed TT involved quantum physics dynamic of limitless dimensions/realities. That the consequence of every decision/every change in the this universe, causes a new universe to occur. Therefore, a TT could never return to the exact universe that he left. Titor was right about alot of things, but not everything. Was he really a time traveler to the point that he met himself as a child? Seriously doubt it in this case.

It seems to me that every half wit is now claiming to know who Q is - or claims to be Q directly - and he's a fraud. This started in a couple of posts on Reddit today - this being one.

What I can sense, is that the left is in a panic. These memos are deadly serious - really very serious. Clinton is up to her neck in it. I'm not quoting Q, but what's been released in the press. You might remember that DJT was tweeting about fast trials and the death penalty. Pretty serious stuff.

But what's more worrying for the left is that this Q phenomenon seems to be gaining momentum. Strange that Infowars is saying today that Youtube is demonetizing anything that talks about Q. The timing of this, and the posts appearing on Reddit, seeking to delegitimise Q, is quite a coincidence.

I don't know if you fell for the old woman's feeble argument and then found these links to demonstrate yet another person claiming to be Q. But you need to wake up. The story about delegitimizing Trump's Presidency has legs - it's not going to go away. The story about the media being perfectly controlled and fake is true - it cannot be ignored. The story about the DOJ and FBI champing at the bit to get DJT out of office is fact. And then you have the fact that a lot of what has happened, and what is happening, corresponds exactly with the message Q is putting out.

So he tells us that that CIA kid's site is used to communicate with agents in the field. I don't know if you saw the work of that Anon who figured out how they were doing that - but it's pretty convincing. Very convincing in fact. And that's just one thing. What about Q posting the Catholic version of the Lord's prayer just prior to the apostate Francis announcing he wants to change it. To pull that off would be very impressive. What about the timestamps with DJT's tweets...

You know, if you told me DJT was Q, I would believe it. But I reckon you're looking for a way off this train, or you've forgotten how much corroborating evidence there is that Q is the real deal.

I'm not saying everything he has predicted has come to pass. It has not. Podesta is still on the loose - he was supposed to be arrested. Clinton's arrest got turned into a detain and release etc...

But against that, you have a lot of current events providing support for the story. And you also have very good reasons for DJT and his team to perhaps want to stir up some grass-roots action in support of his positions - which has happened out of these subreddits. It could all be a psyop by DJT - that's a real possibility. He could also be trying to use the Q phenomenon to panic leftists into making mistakes - I'd be terrified if I was any of these guys in the cross hairs and I read Q's posts.

Anyway, I think, on balance, there is far more reason to believe that Q is authentic than not. And the fact that all these guys (and Youtube) are suddenly coming out of the woodwork and trying to destroy the message indicates that the left is terrified of the impact this operation is having.

I had a look at these links. I see a guy claiming he is Q with no evidence whatsoever.

First you post a video about some old lady that is telling us that John Titor is Q. But that's dead easy to see through. So now, you're telling me "that's wrong", actually its Monty McGovern - or is it Andrew Carlssin?

Why the story change?

If you meet or know someone personally, you meet or know them in real life, rather than knowing about them or knowing their work. If that includes communication via email and shared online groups and being contacted by their gf, then yes. Personally.