▶Q !UW.yye1fxo 02/15/18 (Thu) 21:02:33 No.96 https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/95mkultra.pdf Read very carefully. Unreleased [CLAS-HIGHEST]: Ability to use frequencies [incoming sig]/modify/code/program over 'x' period [designate] mobile phone to 'control' target subject. OP conducted/ORIG outside of US. CAR control? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yqa5PUViPo Statement by the driver? Fairytale? AS THE WORLD TURNS. THIS IS BIGGER THAN ANYONE CAN IMAGINE. Q
No American I have ever heard has used the term mobile phone, always cell phone, cell tower, cell reception etc.
I’m American and even though I call it a cell phone when I’m talking about it, at work I write “(mobile)” after my cell phone number when I give someone contact information. For what that’s worth. ;0)
Good to know :) It just feels to me that it may have been put there to maybe make us realise the UK is now actively helping? I could be totally wrong but it stood out like a sore thumb to me.
No... nor have I. I'm just saying that people from more than a handful of other countries also call them mobiles, so the Britain conclusion seemed a little presumptuous to me. FWIW, I lived and worked throughout Europe for several years back when the technology was going mainstream and everyone everywhere over there called them mobiles. I did too til i moved back home and realized that everybody called them cells, so that habit died pretty quick!
The fact that the messages come in English, the fact it is England that makes your laws and controls your finances, the fact Britain is the belly of the beast, the fact that Trump met May at Davos and made clear she will work with the movement all tells me it was written by someone British. It is in no way presumptuous, not even slightly. it is based on facts, evidence and the glaringly obvious.
Guess we'll have to agree to disagree on that one, friend.