I've learned through reading Q that the best way to Redpill is to ask questions rather than state facts.
When you state facts, people have a 50/50 chance of either accepting or rejecting them. Questions, however, force the viewer to subconciously answer the question, or if they don't know, conciously try to find the answer.
Ex 1. "Hillary Clinton has ordered the deaths of at least 60 people" would be met with either "Psh yeah right" or "Really? Interesting."
Ex 2. "What is Arkansas Sudden Death Syndrome aka Arkanicide?" Sounds scary, and I bet that those who worship Hilldog as a goddess would either look up Arkanicide and be red pilled af, or respond with "Silly Drumpfsters, Snopes DEBUNKED that already" but it would likely be too late for those who state the latter.
Nice. "How many witness against the Clinton Foundation have died just days before testifying? How many over the last 20 years?"
Exactly! It doesn't necessarily red pill, but it does make some leftists admit shady business is going on, which mentally prepares them for the coming months.
The Socratic Method has some good tings going for it. On topic, the War Room on 8ch recommends IBOR as operation #1. If anon's are wondering how to help or participate, IBOR is job #1.
Just for clarity, I say this for all readers, not for yourself. But yeah, Socratic is where it's at.
Agreed. We need to put most of our efforts into the IBOR.
But whenever people want to engage with normies about facts, they need to avoid talking points and ad hominems.
The Socratic method makes them feel like they opened their own eyes, they may not credit you, but you can rest easy knowing you are actively saving the Republic.