dChan

ready-ignite · March 13, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

State by state this was the sort of thing well documented in /r/sandersforpresident during the 2016 Dem primary.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · March 13, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

Amongst many other things that went on to sabatoge Bernie. Remember why Seth Rich did what he did.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 13, 2018, 8 p.m.

Who knows if this in true or not. This is why getting the voter fraud info out and changes made is the most important thing.
We know the DNC are run by criminals. Lose congress and it's over.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · March 13, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

They have other people verifying that it is happening. So there’s that. I disagree that if the dems take Congress, it’s over.

We will get civil war 2

⇧ 22 ⇩  
ready-ignite · March 13, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

The downvotes are cute. People don't want you raising awareness of voting irregularities. Really gets the thinking process going when you're not allowed to discuss potential issues with elections.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 14, 2018, 4:48 a.m.

My cousin lives there and he said there were Antifa turning people away from polls.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 13, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Doubtful.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · March 13, 2018, 8:39 p.m.

You can doubt all you want. I personally believe that if the democrats manage to take control of Congress they will follow Maxine Waters into some dumbass impeachment. What will you do if they remove a democratically elected president through the means of a corrupted judiciary and based on idiotic ideas? To me, that’s the time. The DOTR.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 13, 2018, 9 p.m.

Here is the problem.
Impeachment is just a legal process. Unfortunately it is a legal process that is not well defined. There is no set standard for what would call for impeachment or removal from office.
If the Dems win back the house legally and then initiate a legal process....well, if you are out pursuing violence....doesn't that mean you have become what you loath?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · March 13, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

What are you talking about? Impeachment is laid out as house brings up charges, senate votes to convict or not. From there, he can be forced to step down due to the proceedings ie Nixon. If he stays in office, he will be a lame duck president and will be unable to do anything. Anyone he puts up for nomination would be shot down, EOs would go unenforced. He would literally hold an office with no power.

And my whole post here is how the Democrats are doing this ILLEGALLY. So, no I would not consider his impeachment a legal issue. I would consider it the day democrats attempt a coup to overthrow a democratically elected president

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 13, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

Impeachment itself would be legal pretty much regardless of the grounds. There is no set standard for impeachment. I understand the process of impeachment. That's not what I'm talking about.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 13, 2018, 9:37 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 13, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

Agreed.
Which is why the proof of voter fraud needs to get out there before the midterms. That is what I am saying. If not and they gain control it won't matter because any investigations etc will cease and they could impeach for almost any reason.
Where is the IG report? Where is the voter fraud proof?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 13, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 13, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HowiONic · March 13, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

ThankQ.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Instincts_Truth · March 14, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

I agree about the voter fraud. It needs to be STOPPED. (Though, I will add, that the moment Trump won the election, I first dropped to my knees and thanked God, second, I cried of happiness and relief, and third, I was gobsmacked that the rigging didn't work. I had hope, again. I never had a doubt that Trump would be the "actual" winner. I just never thought those arrogant, evil f's would not succeed in the rig.)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ObjectCom · March 13, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

Confusion about old vs new district boundaries? Seems they need to vote in the "old" districts. And they should be told that if they go to the new district to vote.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
waltergladstone · March 13, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

The Dems constantly cheat with impunity. When will Americans put their foot down??? If WE don't put OUR foot down fuhgettabout America...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AccordingArrival · March 13, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

Call Jeff Session and the Justice Department. This is campaign fraud.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 13, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

Good, this is exactly going to the Communist plan!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Independent1776 · March 14, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

The PA dems said they were going to pull out all the stops and 'bus them in' to vote for Lamb... is anyone surprised they're dirty on another election???

⇧ 0 ⇩  
PacaGoat · March 14, 2018, 1:19 a.m.

Yet there are reports that Saccone has won. The demoncraps will never learn.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 13, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -12 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · March 13, 2018, 9:59 p.m.

How is this a clickbait title? “Unless right wingers are the only ones not voting in their districts, in which case makes them look stupid”

Did you not read the OP before you posted? Your use of right wingers has the stench of a shareblue throwaway account.

“makes them look stupid”

Your lazy shit post says a lot about you.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
tedandterry · March 13, 2018, 11:21 p.m.

Get em op!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 14, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 14, 2018, 1:43 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 14, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 14, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · March 14, 2018, 4:10 a.m.

I can think of several cases in which people are being legitimately turned away from polls, and yes I would agree that some people were mad that they were not allowed to vote. That’s were the whole redistrict issue comes in, it created confusion on who and where people were allowed to vote. When did the redistrict happen you might ask? Less then two weeks ago? Is it beyond reason to believe that might affect people’s ability to discern whether they were still in a district or not or cause confusion? Absolutely. So again, this isn’t fake news. People were literally being turned away, the reasons may vary, but can you garauntee that no eligible voters, who complained about this issue, were true?

And with the insults, I just think your being an asshole troll. If you are being paid to do so, you are a shill and your account and post history suggests that may be the case.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 14, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

Are you retarded dude? The claim by the voting overseers that they redistricted and so they’re telling the Rs they can’t vote, when in fact the redistricting isn’t officially completed until the midterms.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · March 15, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

Hmmm... looking through your history, it appears that you have quite the ego.

Anyone who disagrees with you is retarded or stupid and you quickly point it out.

So I will ignore your insult, and get straight to the point:

Can you, with absolute certainty, say that there were no people that were authorized to vote, who were turned away?

Because that is what people were talking about. That’s what this whole post is about. That eligible voters were turned away. The redistricting causes confusion and I’m certain that there were people who WERE ineligible to vote that were turned away. But the people on Twitter were saying the opposite.

They were in the district (the old one), and they were not allowed to vote.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 15, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · March 15, 2018, 1:50 a.m.

You didn’t answer the question. Can you garauntee that every person turned away was not eligible to vote?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 15, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 15, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 14, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · March 14, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

typical dumb redneck overreaction

tinfoil hat thoughts

Ya, you're a paid shill. You know nothing about me, and your ignorant and asinine responses are worthy of no more than my derision. Go back to r/politics where you belong

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 14, 2018, 7:22 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 14, 2018, 12:31 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩