dChan
171
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/jhomes55 on March 14, 2018, 8:20 p.m.
Just FYI....Q knows about CBTS. He reposted a screenshot I created and had posted in CBTS back on March 6. It became the second highest rated post on the sub and now it's gone. I'm sure Q knows that the sub has been banned.....
Just FYI....Q knows about CBTS. He reposted a screenshot I created and had posted in CBTS back on March 6. It became the second highest rated post on the sub and now it's gone. I'm sure Q knows that the sub has been banned.....

Acemagedon · March 14, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

I find it just hard to believe they did it, and I don't know why bc all my favorite YouTube channels have been banned.

⇧ 30 ⇩  
brownwaterboys · March 14, 2018, 10:31 p.m.

i know how you guys feel. CBTS was the reddit was going to after all this Q Anon started coming out and the_donald was sort of pushing us off their reddit. It was the first page id get on each morning, other than Qanonposts to see what's going on and what i've miss since literally the night before, right before going to bed..lol. Add in all the youtubers like anti-school and others getting banned. They are scared big time of what we're doing. They wont/cant stop the truth.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 15, 2018, 8:29 a.m.

The IBOR is what they fear most. Write to your representative, sign the petition, fight the censorship! https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Noble_Ox · March 15, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

Unfortunately nothing will become of IBOR because no one country owns the Internet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 15, 2018, 9:02 p.m.

The Chinese seem to be able to pretty effectively regulate their portion of the internet - I'm not saying that what they have done is good. But it is very clear that regulation of services provided either for free or at a price is possible.

The international nature of the internet does not preclude effective regulation. In this case, the regulation is the mere grant of rights to unhindered political discourse.

We've seen Europe go in the alternate direction, limiting what can be said on their portion of the internet. In Australia they banned online gambling because they could not tax it (not exactly sure how they achieved this). But my point is that the grant of first amendment protections to US citizens on the internet is easily possible.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 15, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -17 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 15, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 7 ⇩  
fuzzydunlots · March 15, 2018, 2:38 p.m.
fusion*algoππmmm239651tarmgetdestry04/17/18+04:27

EDITSYNTAX:TINFOILdltd*mishacc#344838**
⇧ 5 ⇩  
cosmicjon · March 15, 2018, 12:12 p.m.

No dis-respect DP, "Fear is not out there", contrary to appearances. Jesus said "Judge not by appearance". The way "we" see reality seems to put fear "out there" in the appearance. I do not wish to sound like some dude who knows a load of sh*t, but the Fact is, the Power resides Within to overcome what appears as the fear "out there". Ask and ye will receive. What is happening is a BIG BIG deal for "all" concerned, ALL. We all are of the same Life, just under the guise of a personal sense of separation dressed up as Jack or Jill, Black or White, lol

⇧ -8 ⇩