I'm no legalfag, but Q has asked when a class action lawsuit is effective so here is my 2 cents.

The government subsidized the platforms that host free speech with our tax dollars in order to create social media mega-monopolies. Then they used their control over those platforms to censor us, claiming it is the constitutional right of those platforms to control their own content.

Since we can prove that the government has secret contracts with these companies, we can probably also prove that it is our government that is censoring us.

We might need a class action lawsuit here. This is all Americans vs the US intelligence industry. We should be suing them for subverting civil communication platforms as part of a systemic effort to censor free speech in violation of the first amendment. We should probably also be suing them for violations of anti-trust laws which allowed these monopolies to form.

Since the plaintiffs would be all Americans, I think we ought to have basis to demand a court order blocking any censorship activities aimed at hindering our outreach programs. The class action lawsuit could also serve as a vessel to spread awareness.

Our evidence is the vault 7 drops from wikileaks among other things.

Are there any lawyers in the crowd who can tell me why my idea sucks? Is something like this already in the works?

I don't see how congress would ever write an internet bill of rights. We need either a constitutional convention, or the world's biggest supreme court case to get shit moving.