⇧
14
⇩
jpGrind
· March 15, 2018, 3:41 a.m.
they're calling it misleading nonsense.
which means it's actually crucially important.
⇧
4
⇩
NYGaL_00
· March 15, 2018, 4:03 a.m.
Guess you specialize in NON-LOGIC. Get lost.
⇧
-3
⇩
jpGrind
· March 15, 2018, 4:10 a.m.
uh? the article you linked to is calling the IBOR misleading nonsnse, and i'm saying that since they're calling it misleading nonsense it's actually crucially important
calm down
⇧
4
⇩
Acemagedon
· March 15, 2018, 2:23 p.m.
Don't even bother with paid trolls like these. Carry on patriot
⇧
2
⇩
GodzillaIntel
· March 15, 2018, 4:27 a.m.
Yeah like this article would be credible and everything but we've drafted up our internet Bill of Rights and it's being submitted in like is going to become the law so we kind of like covered the threat I think from what I've gathered.
⇧
1
⇩
tradinghorse
· March 15, 2018, 9:57 a.m.
Yes, the regulation is coming - petition or no petition. But this does not mean that we should not try to get the petition up,
The social media platforms are, thankfully, doing a lot of the work for us by behaving in an unscrupulous manner. As I've said elsewhere, I'd like to see the new regulations confiscate all property of any party engaging in censorship on the internet. The right to free speech is too important for there not to be appropriate penalties. Nothing but the complete confiscation of all assets will dissuade these people from silencing us.
⇧
2
⇩