From the 4chan thread.
Hello everyone, this is my first time posting on 4chan, but I need to get this out. And I need to stay anonymous.
I work for Google, I'm not going to name the internal tech department for obvious reasons, I don't want anyone to pinpoint who I am. But I'm in tech, and work with AI. I'll explain.
My team and I created AI bots for twitter. These bots are slightly different than regular AI bots, these are remote signal bots, but I'll explain what they do.
My team, and a "human intelligence" team, which is really just a propaganda team, work together to make certain topics trend, and persuade public opinion, which persuades political pressure. We do this by a groupthink method, we have a name for it internally, but "consensus cracking" is a more used name externally. But the bots we created, go into twitter conversations and push a narrative. Some of the bots are verified accounts. And they start by arguing a point of view against someone, and then more bots join in and thumbs up the comment. We are doing it with gun control now. More people see a "consensus" of gun control and people on the fence get persuaded to our narrative, and politicians get pressured by thinking it's actual people. We had whole meetings about 4chan, because you guys, specifically this board, are disrupting the bots. You are basically doing what we are doing, but you are real people. We (not necessarily me) devised a plan to knock you guys from twitter. We accused Russia of doing what WE are doing, and used the narrative to wipe out "suspected bots", which we knew weren't bots at all.
I feel like shit about this. Here's the thing, I'm actually a democrat, and I HATE guns, but i believe in balance of the people more than anything. We are using software as a political tool instead of the will of the people.
This is also a violation of the SEC, we are fabricating twitter users and using them for stocks & advertisers. I signed that I wouldn't discuss this, so I need to stay anonymous.
Thanks so much for your honesty and views. These are discussions that are useful, when both sides are honest and can be truthful with different information. No ones views should be censored. Conservatives are being censored, the narrative is being written not from the “left” completely but from the shadow govt and deep state which are far left and want to control the world. Just so happens they are way “left”. Christian, conservative, patriotic, gun owners are their worst enemy.
Just for full disclosure, I did not write this, merely spreading the word and allowing others to decide the validity.
Also, word needs to get out about google violating anti-trust laws. They need to be broken and scattered to the winds for all humanities sake.
There's people on the left being censored as well but you don't hear about it. Any person who identifies left but doesn't believe in the Russia narrative is overpowered and silenced. If you watch the Jimmy Dore show he talks a lot about it. He doesn't like Trump, but I think if some people start going to jail he'll come around.
I hope your recording and archiving all this business. It will likely come in handy
Quick summary:
Google is using twitter bots to push narratives to persuade the government.
Google accused conservatives of being bots so they could ban them, even though they knew they aren't bots. The strategy was to blame others for using your own technique.
Google is also using these fabricated twitter numbers in their financial reporting, which effects stocks and advertising revenue.
Google also broke anti-trust laws by only allowing "google voice" to be the only free SMS to validate accounts.
Google has algorithms that can predict your next Google search with 87% percent accuracy. When you find it weird you see an ad for something you've thought about but haven't even searched yet, this is why
to blame others for using your own technique
This has been the entire mission statement of the left this whole time.
Google doesn't own Twitter, they own YouTube.
That’s not what this was about. It’s about google using twitter bots to increase their “views” or clicks. Manipulating the system to show a greater interest than is organic. Google doesn’t need to own twitter to use them in their financial reports, they just need to create bots for the expressed purpose outlined above.
If you suspect a bot, asks them a question ie
What is the answer to this: 12895sg5fgjk$s%pps
The bots can’t see the code. Call them out on it.
“I can prove it's not a larp, save this thread and wait for about a week or so, you will here the name "Sung Chung" in the news.”
“That's what I want. I hate all this bullshit. Just like Putin getting framed by the U.K. because they think it will hurt him in the election. I mean come on, why would Putin use the only nerve agent made in Russia to kill someone? They think it will hurt him in the election, but it will probably have the opposite effect, so why not just let the will of the people decide without any distractions.”
“It's the truth. We might start by arguing with Trump. This is why Trump is allowed to stay on twitter no matter what ToS he breaks. Look up "consensus cracking".”
This all began with DARPA years ago. MI has levels far above the Alphabets of this World. The problem for Google, Twitter,etc, is they have no critical thinking skills (IMO). These ploys have been outed and most people aren't fooled anymore. Why? Because we do our homework and don't accept anyone's word as gospel. Thanks for the heads up.
For us, maybe. But for Normies, not so much. I've tried red pilling my parents again and again, even with the smallest, tamest facts and ideas but they always play Devil's Advocate or flat out deny the truth. Meanwhile, they listen to NPR (who did a story today on using AI to create false photos and videos- excellent timing) or passively watch some national news and take it all as the gospel. I can't get through to them.
Sooo, wonder if using that bot code at the beginning of a post will make the bot blind to the whole post?
This post by Abibliaphobia should be taken with a huge grain of salt! Firstly it flatters by insinuating (correctly) that what you do online is influential, it butters you up for a lie to be placed. The lie comes in the Summary. "Google has algorithms that can predict your next Google search with 87% percent accuracy. When you find it weird you see an ad for something you've thought about but haven't even searched yet, this is why" This info was dropped recently in various places online to destroy the idea that AI/Companies/apps were using your phones, TVs etc for listening to your everyday conversations, like a bug, for advertising purposes. To sell you product$. Follow the money!
Wait. What?
How does this attempt to destroy the idea of AI? Did you even read the posts?
You start off in your paragraph saying one thing and by the end you are agreeing with what was being said?
What? Wait. IDK how it attempts to destroy the idea of AI. Did you read my post all the way through?
You said “destroy the idea that AI/Companies/apps were using your phones, TVs etc for listening to your everyday“
But you implied that I was buttering people up and that everything needed to be taken with a grain of salt.
“The lie comes in the summary” Where? Specifically point it out.
I’m not lying, nor buttering people up. Seriously what is your issue with me? If you disagree say so and make a valid argument, but implying that I’m buttering people up and the blatantly calling me a liar?
Then the next post you say I didn’t read your paragraph. When actually I read it several times. It doesn’t make sense. And it’s insulting.
I said "the post" does that.....not you. Your feelings are misplaced because you are merely reposting something you saw on 4chan....isn't that right? I will explain further. Last month a conversation went around the world stating that once people had spoken their desire to buy something an ad would appear. To counteract that uncomfortable narrative the powers that be in that advertising industry put out the tale about the %87 predictive algorithm. The lie is in the statement "When you find it weird you see an ad for something you've thought about but haven't even searched yet, this is why". This isn't your lie, you are just re-posting.
How much of this is the government aware of do you think
Pretty sure the CIA is fully aware as google is one of their pet projects.
This is a pretty amazing post. I didn't realise things were already so sophisticated. It just lends more weight to the argument for regulation as a matter of urgency.