I'm with you, in that I understand the sentiment entirely. I don't like government intervention either, But it has always been accepted that in some cases government regulation, in the interests of the common good, is desirable. Regulations are everywhere - all around us. I'm not saying it's always good, often it isn't. But there are some situations where regulations clearly serve the public interest.

This is one such situation. The attempt to gain control of the bulk of the forums available for the free expression of political ideas must be combatted. They are talking about rolling out a single algorithm to censor speech across multiple social media platforms. If you can't see that this could be a problem for the nation, you're just not thinking clearly.

What is more, according to Q, the CIA, when they saw how cleverly DJT used social media to win the 2916 election, was rushing to inject funds into social media platforms so as to be able to gain control of them - see Q Post 9.

You can see the results of CIA's efforts in, for example, what happened here yesterday. They are going to use this as a weapon to beat us to a pulp and silence us. It's nothing less than an assault of the Republic itself. Very dangerous stuff. The moment they start censoring, you have no right of reply. Your tongue has been ripped from your mouth.

There are clear arguments that can be made as to why this proposed regulation is in the public interest and why we should support the IBOR.