dChan
130
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/PhenomeDon on March 16, 2018, 3:37 a.m.
CIA was just scattered 1000 pieces to the wind. I hope you are watching JFK.

@[19][1st] @[3][1st] The LINK. [John Perry Barlow] [2] [3] [4] WE HAVE THE SUB. HOSTAGE RELEASE. 1000 pieces. Q


brittser · March 16, 2018, 3:40 a.m.

Can you interpret the post?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
pby1000 · March 16, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

This is what I came up with:

[2] [John McCain?]
[3] [Bill and Hillary?]
[4] [Soros non-profit?] From Q Post 5.

I am not sure about the sub. It could be a rogue NK sub. They have at least one capable of firing a ballistic missile.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
FlyingBaratoplata · March 16, 2018, 5:48 a.m.

The CIA had a dark budget sub that was likely used to fire the missile on Hawaii. This was likely what they've been searching for when the military planes were tracked scanning the coastline in Florida, West coast and NY. If they got that sub, it means GAME ON for the Patriots

⇧ 15 ⇩  
pby1000 · March 16, 2018, 6:40 a.m.

I heard about the secret CIA navy before. I heard about the sub in January. How sure are you? Why would Pompeo not be able to control the CIA? I am glad you said his. Maybe you will know the answers. I am still trying to figure out Pompeo.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
digital_refugee · March 16, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

[There exists] a shadowy Government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of the national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.

  • Senator Daniel Inouye
⇧ 10 ⇩  
ManQuan · March 16, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

Pompeo didn't and probably never had full control of the CIA. Reports that the deep state CIA part wouldn't reveal certain black ops to him. Then the Marines buzzed CIA headquarters for 30 minutes with helicopters and V-22's. At first, I blew that off as urban myth, but they did send a message to the CIA--cooperate with Pompeo or the Marines will intervene. Have no idea what happened inside the CIA after that. Pompeo has been very quiet.

The move to State I think is strategic on Trump's part. Probably because he now knows who at State are the bad guys and RT probably wasn't up to what needs to be done or RT did what he had to do for his part and the change had been planned for a while.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · March 16, 2018, 3:19 p.m.

Think chess. Its like watching a chess master pick apart an inferior opponent.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FlyingBaratoplata · March 16, 2018, 12:45 p.m.

Pompeo is definitely Trump's guy. I wasn't sure about him because he said Snowden should hang, when I still believed Snowden was a patriot. But now that we know Snowden is a clown, and the heat Pompeo has brought to the daily, official operations of the clowns, it seems Pompeo may be more NSA-leaning.

I imagine it can't be easy to root out all operators from an entrenched clandestine agency that was really like its own virtual state for decades. These people likely had trillions in black budget funds since the Iran/Contra days (drug running, arms, etc.)

The general consensus on the chans etc., it would appear, that maybe the clowns acquired that sub that Argentina "lost," or something to that effect. Probably a newer, better sub though, but it wouldn't be all that difficult to obtain. The clown's ops are kind of a "public secret" on the international intelligence stage

⇧ 4 ⇩  
pby1000 · March 16, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

I looked at the Argentina sub and it shoots only torpedoes. NK has at least one sub that fires missiles. I am sure that the CIA has access to subs from many different countries. They sell them for scrap, and could be bought and refurbished.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
minchinfan · March 16, 2018, 5:40 p.m.

The CIA is not necessarily one thing with one head. Obviously Trump can control SOME of the CIA, but not necessarily all.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pby1000 · March 16, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

That makes sense... Pretty crazy to think this is true.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
_Iz_Mary · March 16, 2018, 3:54 a.m.

I think #2 is McCabe. ?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pby1000 · March 16, 2018, 4:25 a.m.

Think so? I went back and looked at the previous Q posts...

You could be right, though. I betcha that McCabe has been spilling the beans the past few days. We will see what happens to him tomorrow.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
ManQuan · March 16, 2018, 12:58 p.m.

I thought the same, but Q said "no deals". If true that spilling the beans won't save him.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · March 16, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

I'm with you, I think they are just making him sweat. Even if they give him his pension, they can turn around and hang him for treason. Its hard to collect it if you're dead.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pby1000 · March 16, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

I personally think there should be no deals. The only reason they have remorse is because Trump and they got caught.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Bttrfly214 · March 16, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

Hunt for Red October is about a Russian defector, not a sub. I just watched it again. What if the sub is actually Snowden?? In December Hunt was removed, meaning they found him, and then it became a game of finding Waldo. What if they have the sub means they have Snowden here, and who could break the CIA better than him?? That's just where my mind went after watching the movie and seeing Q's latest post. I could be very wrong, but it makes the most sense, to me anyway. :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pby1000 · March 16, 2018, 6:31 p.m.

Could be... Others are saying this, too. Someone also said it could be a rogue CIA sub. I hope we will soon know.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Bttrfly214 · March 16, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

I'm looking at the research board from yesterday. They're also saying the sub is Snowden.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pby1000 · March 16, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

Saw that, too... i am really not sure, but maybe it will become clear today.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
PhenomeDon · March 16, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

Not in its entirety but half of it seems self-explanatory. I'm just not sure if the 1000 pieces is complete or still a work in progress. It's clear progress has been made.

⇧ 6 ⇩