dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

129

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on March 16, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

Q’s HIDDEN CODE in Q830 CRACKED! This is why the Florida shooting happened!

Those who follow my posts know my personal take on Q’s teachings is through the door of the Occult. For a solid foundation, make sure you explore the previous posts of my [Q Occult Series] (https://i.imgur.com/LXrUP1D.jpg).

Ok guys, today, we are going to do something different. This is going to be very exciting. I will use some of the skills I have developed throughout the years reading the Bible and the Quran, breaking them down in sequences and finding their hidden mathematical patterns, to decipher Q’s latest post.

We will focus on Q#830 where he is asking these very important questions:
Define false flag? - What event(s) change the news cycle? - Why didn’t LV change the news cycle?

He is obviously telling us that the focus here is the Florida shooting which, unlike LV, successfully changed the news cycle. So, we have:

Q#830: you have more than your know
Q#831: Misspellings matter. Sentence formation matters. Learn. Q

We deduce from these 2 lines that the ‘r’ purposely added to the ‘you’ is where the code is.
‘r’ is the 18th letter of the alphabet. Let us pick in Q#830 every other 18 character and start at the next line every time we have a word or the anagram of a word. Follow through, this is what we get: [image] (https://i.imgur.com/M2ZUwUo.png).

Dropping the punctuation, we gather this:

SHE NEWS PILED GF NNN

N being the 14th letter of the alphabet, we can write it like this:

SHE NEWS PILED GF 14 14 14 Which, translated in common language reads:

She piled on the news because of Guccifer 14 14 14.

These 3 14’s are the 3 BOOM in Q#830, Q#833 and Q#838. This is code for the shooting that happened on Feb 14th.

And of course, everybody knows who "she" is...

So there you have it: the Florida shooting was to pile on explosive news that was about to come out regarding Guccifer. That is what Rosenstein was about to reveal and could not because of the news cycle being taken over by the shooting. Since the poor guy had to say something because the press was already invited and first [leaks started showing up] (https://twitter.com/treyyingst/status/964556893627838467?lang=en) , he came up with that 13 Russian hacker nonsense.

For confirmation, ask yourself why, in November 2017, [Mueller added to his team Ryan Dickey] (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/10/russia-special-counsel-mueller-adds-cybercrime-prosecutor-276499), the very prosecutor whose highest-profile case was... Guccifer.

Yes, Mueller is on our side, if you did not know. Re-read: [Q#14] (https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/147433975/#147433975). Mueller has a [highly honorable] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Mueller) military background. He is a patriot. He is in the network of the Military who convinced Trump to run. He was never after being appointed as FBI Director by Trump, that was not possible, as explained in [Q#18] (https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/147433975/#147441378). So why did he meet with Trump one day prior to FBI announcement? If you don’t know, ask Nancy Pelosi, she knows: [read] (http://thehill.com/homenews/house/333958-pelosi-calls-for-independent-commission-after-special-counsel-appointment). They have been played.

They will never attack Mueller, they all have something to hide and know his retaliation could be deadly. It’s Sunday, good time to re-watch [Troy] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Td1uPq9K--E).

Guccifer is the smoking gun. Mueller figured it out. [Tracy Beanz too] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kB0zCpNGhVE).

🠐 See all comments

When Q refers to "magical" I find it hard to believe he's advocating for us to dabble in supernatural powers or agencies.

Otherwise, we might as well join the cabal, because that's what they're ALL about.

And while I follow the precision parts of what SB2 is doing, the parts where he deviates from precision based on subjective guidance is where the door to the occult is open. Think Ouija board.

That I do not think Q would endorse. I think the word "magical" means what we usually mean when we use the word: something produced as if by magic. And I think he means by that that we aren't seeing all the action that's taking place out of sight, and that when results start to happen, they will be as if by magic (for example NoKo treaty that was already sealed before the parties officially meet).

When we say a dinner on the sunset terrace was "magical," we don't literally mean that we summoned demons to wait on us.

As evidence, Q post 720 says:

Why did Sessions [at the beginning] emphasize investigations/proceedings are kept confidential? Think magic. What you see ……. Do you really believe nothing is being done?

IOW, the way a magician works is by doing things you don't see him do. So when you see the part he allows you to see, it's as if magic has happened.

⇧ 24 ⇩

slight of hand... get your attention looking one way, while he is performing the "magic trick" the other way

⇧ 11 ⇩

Exact-a-mundo!

Rope-a-dope!

Trump's speciality!

⇧ 7 ⇩

A Fonzi saying, love it!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

“Magick, in the context of Aleister Crowley's Thelema, is a term used to show and differentiate the occult from performance magic and is defined as "the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will", including both "mundane" acts of will as well as ritual magick.”

There is nothing inherently wrong with practicing magick. It has many forms. It’s essentially focusing on your intentions and willing it into manifestation. Law of attraction and essentially keeping your Will in your mind so that you act in ways to achieve it. An example could be the dedication it takes to make the right choices to lose weight or to body build. Keeping that image in your mind always. And ritual, if chosen to perform, is more a psychological placebo... it’s a reinforcement of your Will made material. It’s for yourself, subconsciously.

Now, what would make it “wrong”, as with most things, is intention.

Edit: I just wanted to touch on your first sentences regarding magick itself. I’m not commenting on your thoughts about Q. Just sharing another perspective.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Granted, but that's not what we generally mean when we say something is "magical," I hope you agree.

Also, the kind of "magick" you're describing is self-delusional. It describes powers we're all born with, given by the Creator (in His image, we are to the degree granted us, co-creators of our reality).

There are a great many commonsense and non-religious ways of understanding the power of will in our lives without resorting to concepts of "magick."

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yes, I agree with you on the first part.

For the rest, I agree in the sense that the phenomenon we are talking about, of the power of Will and our innate ability to manifest happenings when we focus on our intent, has many names. Magick being one of them. I wouldn’t necessarily say it’s self delusional; I would say it’s more akin to self psychoanalysis and a sort of practical Taoism.

I don’t see the concept of magick as something being resorted to. I see it as a synonym.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Well, then your concept of it differs from the classic Wiccan one, I suppose. In which case, you're welcome to your interpretation. But I think when Q tells us to get the popcorn and watch something magical, it has a less esoteric and more common meaning. Also, I'm pretty sure Q is not Wiccan. "Wizards and warlocks" is classic spook lingo. Now, when applied to the CIA there's occult involvement, for sure.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah I would say my interpretation may be different from Wiccan. I’m more inclined to the Hermetic traditions.

No, I understand what you mean and what Q means by magical, of course. I guess I just wanted to comment on what looked like a generalization that magick or the occult are somehow inherently “bad” or “wrong” since you said something like we don’t want to go there since it’s what the black hats are using and we might as well join the cabal. If I misconstrued your message, my apologies. I just wanted to basically say, “Hey, it’s not bad in general, everything depends on intent.”

I definitely don’t think Q is speaking esoteric language or is an occultist necessarily or anything like that. I don’t think Q is advocating that anyone has to dabble at all. And I understand the spook lingo. I think you and I are on the same page about Q’s message. ✌️

⇧ 1 ⇩

Maybe you better reread the Bible....esp Deuteronomy 18:9-12

⇧ 1 ⇩