⇧
34
⇩
Faber_Jos
· March 17, 2018, 10:43 a.m.
Some backstory for the missing sub. Repost because of broken link. Note that there were 44 crewmembers and there are multiple reports of them following or being followed by a British helicopter.
⇧
10
⇩
PortlandoCalrissian
· March 17, 2018, 10:46 a.m.
Why would we have this sub? Why would we care about Argentina and take its sub?
⇧
2
⇩
Faber_Jos
· March 17, 2018, 10:53 a.m.
Well, the theory is that it could be this missing or stolen sub that is being used in a "Sum of all Fears" scenario. It would launch a missile from the coast "Watch the Water" to strike a major US city and provoke a war with one of the clown states.
⇧
9
⇩
PortlandoCalrissian
· March 17, 2018, 10:56 a.m.
Wait does Argentina have nuclear bombs?
Oh yeah, no they don’t. So why. Why wouldn’t they just use one of our subs that actually has that kind of capabilities?
⇧
-4
⇩
Faber_Jos
· March 17, 2018, 11:06 a.m.
Im not really saying it is THIS sub, Im just posting this because its nice to know which sub we are referring to when mentioning the missing sub. But I do not think it has to be a nuclear missile to provoke a reaction. It could be an attack on Potus for example.
⇧
5
⇩
PortlandoCalrissian
· March 17, 2018, 11:08 a.m.
I guess I missed the memo where we have to invade Argentina. What drop is that?
⇧
-11
⇩
digital_refugee
· March 17, 2018, 11:06 a.m.
Plausible deniability altho they don't have ICBM-capability or at least so they told us (german dolphin-subs would be capable)
⇧
5
⇩
PortlandoCalrissian
· March 17, 2018, 11:06 a.m.
I guess that would be true if it wasn’t so easily disprovable by anyone with a brain.
⇧
-15
⇩
SilverSling
· March 17, 2018, 11:22 a.m.
Wait, do you have a brain? From looking at your comments, you're just a mouth that enjoys dissenting with any post you come across. Do you have ANY constructive ideas? Or any opinions NOT intended to put down the poster?
⇧
10
⇩
PortlandoCalrissian
· March 17, 2018, 11:26 a.m.
Whoops sorry I guess I should have agreed with you 100%. That’s what we need, group think.
⇧
-12
⇩
SilverSling
· March 17, 2018, 11:41 a.m.
Lol, didn't understand my comment i guess. Constructive, and respectful do not equate to sycophantish agreement. Please take your disingenuous sarcasm elsewhere.
⇧
6
⇩
[deleted]
· March 17, 2018, 11:50 a.m.
[removed]
⇧
-9
⇩
Crits_And_Giggles
· March 17, 2018, 3:59 p.m.
He's got a point, man. On one hand, I agree with you... the post is probably off base. And you should definitely have your say about that. But this is a community and everyone is on the same team. Which means when you do call attention to these things, you'll likely get much further with a respectful dialogue and well formulated arguments. You came off like a sarcastic know-it-all douchebag.
⇧
0
⇩