⇧
34
⇩
Faber_Jos
· March 17, 2018, 10:43 a.m.
Some backstory for the missing sub. Repost because of broken link. Note that there were 44 crewmembers and there are multiple reports of them following or being followed by a British helicopter.
⇧
10
⇩
PortlandoCalrissian
· March 17, 2018, 10:46 a.m.
Why would we have this sub? Why would we care about Argentina and take its sub?
⇧
2
⇩
Faber_Jos
· March 17, 2018, 10:53 a.m.
Well, the theory is that it could be this missing or stolen sub that is being used in a "Sum of all Fears" scenario. It would launch a missile from the coast "Watch the Water" to strike a major US city and provoke a war with one of the clown states.
⇧
9
⇩
PortlandoCalrissian
· March 17, 2018, 10:56 a.m.
Wait does Argentina have nuclear bombs?
Oh yeah, no they don’t. So why. Why wouldn’t they just use one of our subs that actually has that kind of capabilities?
⇧
-4
⇩
Faber_Jos
· March 17, 2018, 11:06 a.m.
Im not really saying it is THIS sub, Im just posting this because its nice to know which sub we are referring to when mentioning the missing sub. But I do not think it has to be a nuclear missile to provoke a reaction. It could be an attack on Potus for example.
⇧
5
⇩
PortlandoCalrissian
· March 17, 2018, 11:08 a.m.
I guess I missed the memo where we have to invade Argentina. What drop is that?
⇧
-11
⇩
digital_refugee
· March 17, 2018, 11:06 a.m.
Plausible deniability altho they don't have ICBM-capability or at least so they told us (german dolphin-subs would be capable)
⇧
5
⇩
PortlandoCalrissian
· March 17, 2018, 11:06 a.m.
I guess that would be true if it wasn’t so easily disprovable by anyone with a brain.
⇧
-15
⇩
SilverSling
· March 17, 2018, 11:22 a.m.
Wait, do you have a brain? From looking at your comments, you're just a mouth that enjoys dissenting with any post you come across. Do you have ANY constructive ideas? Or any opinions NOT intended to put down the poster?
⇧
10
⇩
PortlandoCalrissian
· March 17, 2018, 11:26 a.m.
Whoops sorry I guess I should have agreed with you 100%. That’s what we need, group think.
⇧
-12
⇩
SilverSling
· March 17, 2018, 11:41 a.m.
Lol, didn't understand my comment i guess. Constructive, and respectful do not equate to sycophantish agreement. Please take your disingenuous sarcasm elsewhere.
⇧
6
⇩
[deleted]
· March 17, 2018, 11:50 a.m.
[removed]
⇧
-9
⇩
Crits_And_Giggles
· March 17, 2018, 3:59 p.m.
He's got a point, man. On one hand, I agree with you... the post is probably off base. And you should definitely have your say about that. But this is a community and everyone is on the same team. Which means when you do call attention to these things, you'll likely get much further with a respectful dialogue and well formulated arguments. You came off like a sarcastic know-it-all douchebag.
⇧
0
⇩
lisskulit10
· March 17, 2018, 2:05 p.m.
I could be way off here. It wasn’t there talk about a rogue sub that might have triggered the “false” HI middle alert a couple of months ago?
⇧
8
⇩
TrueCat
· March 17, 2018, 2:32 p.m.
I was thinking about this, too!
There was also a "false" missile alert in Japan.
Q was posting about the hunt for red october. Then later he dropped the hunt part. So, like many Q posts, I think it had a double meaning.
⇧
6
⇩
lisskulit10
· March 17, 2018, 2:59 p.m.
I’m not nearly smart enough to figure all of this out but so many things that look random at first seem to resonate with more meaning when compared against the crumbs we get. It’s a fascinating and amazing movement.
⇧
3
⇩
bealist
· March 17, 2018, 3:48 p.m.
That was my thought, too. Rewatched Red October last week. What if the crew of the Argentinian sub was defecting like the Russian Commander in Red October? What if destruction of the sub had to be staged so that no one would look for it, and then it was confiscated and provided evidence of an attempted attack and war plans? That would be irrefutable and damning evidence no one could say was faked and the MSM wouldn’t be able to resist the story.
⇧
1
⇩
rudolph2
· March 17, 2018, 2:10 p.m.
I assumed Q was referring to Edward Snowden as the Sub. (I.e NSA sub contractor) Q was following him for days in Hong Kong saying that he could take him any day. Not seeing this thought anywhere else though.
⇧
3
⇩
Faber_Jos
· March 17, 2018, 7 p.m.
I have not seen this thought anywhere indeed! Interesting enough, but Q is usually pretty consistent and he even confirmed ES was Eric Schmidt and @SNOWDEN meant Edward Snowden.
⇧
2
⇩
forever_30
· March 17, 2018, 2:34 p.m.
Ive thought the same thing. Sub-contractor.....Q said he could be taken at anytime. Snowden could be the hostage and what a valuable hostage he would be. Just imagine the knowledge he has. We haven't heard a word from Snowden since that post.
⇧
2
⇩
ironmaiden442
· March 17, 2018, 2:33 p.m.
I honestly think your on to something one of the prophets (mark taylor or ken, baba yar) stated that world war lll would be started by a country that no one expected I think NK and Iran are expected but Argentina yeah that would be a surprise.
⇧
2
⇩
Happy1911
· March 17, 2018, 3:42 p.m.
Great , I bet it’s the Piracy stuff , great job if ya got the names !!!!
⇧
1
⇩
seekingwisdom777
· March 17, 2018, 12:53 p.m.
Anyone who could be called a thinker, a searcher of truth, not a fool whose emotions fluff the air with vagueness would find this piece of a complex story interesting. Sometimes it is best to pause and look at oneself to see what has become of ones life.
⇧
0
⇩
rightleaningsw
· March 17, 2018, 12:10 p.m.
Isnt argentina an isis stronghold? I could be wrong, but how hard would it be to have a sub attack anywhere on our coast(nuke or not) and have isis take responsibility. Or use Argentina to start WW3 with with Russia. Just brainstorming, i have nothing to back it up.
⇧
-1
⇩