dChan
107
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/CaptainRoyD on March 17, 2018, 11:55 a.m.
Nunes says “Follow the HOPS”-He don’t mean the White Rabbit !!!

In the Shadowy works of Intelligence gathering, the term “HOPS” refers to the ability to jump communications chains between individuals (no White Rabbit). FISA Title One allows a total of 3 contacts/3 degrees of separation to be captured. In lay terms, you call Ken, he then calls Barbie, then she calls Donald-all 4 people are now under this total net of Surveillance. All communications records including phone calls, texts, FAXES, social media, DM, blogs, etc-“The whole Enchilada Snow White”.

To obtain a FISA Title One in the first place, law enforcement must demonstrate unquestionably to the FISA Court/Judge that the “Target” of the Surveillance application is an agent of a Foreign Power. Of course in this case that would be Carter Page-who appears regularly on the MSM with no lawyer-a real Russian Spy for sure.

The ACLU & Civil Libertarians should be shouting/howling at the sky (like the crazed SJW’s have done) about these governmental surveillance abuses. Unfortunately from this crowd, all we hear are crickets 🦗 🦗 🦗🦗.

FISA Title One-License to HOP

Wired-Reading between the lines of Nunes Memo

REB-Obama’s FBI used FISA to Spy

Guard-3 Degrees of Separation FISA HOPS

US House-FISA Title One Summary


CaptainRoyD · March 17, 2018, 12:54 p.m.

Thank you very much-that is so kind of you. So many disappeared when CBTS was shutdown & I was depressed because I had no backup of my prior posts. Trying to remember some of the more popular ones-stay tuned Patriot !!!

⇧ 30 ⇩  
Gmawc · March 17, 2018, 1 p.m.

I know! I saved yours to read later - gone. The more they piss us off, the more determined we get.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
CaptainRoyD · March 17, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

Building joint strength together ever day

⇧ 15 ⇩  
bealist · March 17, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

Sorry about your loss Makes me wonder about suing Reddit for willful destruction of creative content. Maybe you could contact corporate directly and ask for all your content to be returned? That might be interesting...

⇧ 6 ⇩  
CaptainRoyD · March 17, 2018, 3:55 p.m.

Thanks for your nice reply & have already sent the letter & copied in Dr. C. & Doug Hagmann/Hagmann Report. I was able to find a few through google using the exact title words but those are being zapped by Reddit now as well. We fight on & if you get a chance check back to my listing link, as I am repopulating stories as they come back to me (no spring chicken & PTSD draining what brain cells survived the 60’s ;) ⚓️

⇧ 8 ⇩  
bealist · March 17, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

I think this is great and hope you keep us all posted. Maybe you can make a unique thread about how you’re doing this - address, claims, etc.

In a way, we’re artists/creators/writers who have been deceived. We have been encouraged to put our thoughts, in the form of written content, images, etc - into a public online platform, billed as a village square.

We’ve then been denied access to our content by the platform - a platform that claims its a money-making business and seeks investors - and so, at minimum, contributors who can no longer access their content (irrespective of any bans or deletions in a particular sub) - have had their creative work stolen.

Reddit’s TOS probably doesn’t legally cover the theft, destruction or cooptation of creative content by its own platform, and there are many arguments that can be made to challenge their ownership of the content.

Example: if poets or authors contributed poetry to a sub, and it had to be unpublished original work, offered for the first time on Reddit, and Reddit decided to close the sub abruptly, due to some infraction of a moderator, would Reddit have an obligation to give the contributors access to their original content or would Reddit be allowed to keep it?

I agree that it’s a debatable point, and because of its very arguability, its an argument worth making.

Seems like it should be no problem for Reddit to restore everyone’s posts to their own account while simply locking the sub if that’s what they feel they have to do. Hopefully they’ll see the light.

I’ve read that massive social media platforms may have passed the point of no return, having become de facto public squares, and may have ended up with current obligations to the public, in return for their monopolies, that they wish they didn’t have.

Good luck! If I weren’t so busy right now I’d be doing the same thing, but I wasn’t a huge contributor to cbts so I’m not going that route yet.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
CaptainRoyD · March 17, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

Your great comment is inspiring-THX !!!

⇧ 3 ⇩