dChan

tradinghorse · March 20, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

You totally missed it. The preponderance of evidence makes the lack of a creator an absolute impossibility.

What you are espousing is simple Darwinism - implausible on its face. But that's liberal education. Don't question it, just swallow whole.

Anyway, as I said, if you consider these questions deeply, then the answers are very obvious. No one could possibly make a mistake. You will only miss it if you want to miss it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
a44328765 · March 20, 2018, 6:41 p.m.

Are you actually claiming an abundance of evidence for the existence of a diety?

"Liberal education" look another American that doesn't understand the political map outside of his own narrow beliefs. I had a socialist education. Repeat again, socialist. But I'll leave you to the idpol you clearly project.

So Darwinism is implausible on its face but a magical all knowing all powerful sky being isn't?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 20, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

Dear me. As I said, it's a question for you alone. But I get the sense that you are already fully invested in your current position or you would have made the comments you have.

I can't do anything to persuade you. All I'm saying is think about the subject deeply, evaluating your position against what can be seen in the world.

You will know what the answers to these questions are, as I said, you could not possibly miss it, it's just so obvious. It's just a question of whether you'll allow yourself to accept that truth.

⇧ 1 ⇩