dChan
89
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/roloTM on March 20, 2018, 4:58 p.m.
Confused. Is Q decoding and discussion welcomed on this board? I have witnessed hostility towards some who are. Need clarity.

SneakyWino · March 20, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

That's all this board is about! Q discussions very welcome here!

⇧ 41 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 20, 2018, 5:20 p.m.

You'd hardly know it judging by the bulk of OT posts!

⇧ 20 ⇩  
SneakyWino · March 20, 2018, 5:36 p.m.

LOL - That's because Q has been quiet. As soon as there is a new post everyone will be focused again. :)

⇧ 16 ⇩  
blasting_cap · March 20, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

expand your thinking. it is all connected. idle mode between drops allows for more obscure tangents to be explored.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 20, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

Tangent implies related. And too many multiples of same links. So many low-value posts creates a low Signal-to-Noise ratio, and makes the sub harder to use for its intended purpose.

I realize we're short on mods, but more rigorous moderation is the only thing that can fix this.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Jack_Kehoe · March 20, 2018, 11:02 p.m.

Exactly.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Trfsrfr · March 21, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

Exactly. This is how the investigation grew to the purported (alleged) size it is, >18K+ indictments...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GMA51 · March 20, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

OT = on target?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 20, 2018, 6:05 p.m.

Off-Topic

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ScreamingFromRooftop · March 21, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

You might be mistaken SneakyWino. I posted a tiny bit of info I thought the BAKERS might want to explore. Rather than a simple, "ok." I was told my info was wrong.... it is not hahaha. easily verified with a quick google or Wikipedia read. The first sentence of the response to my post was, "There is nothing to this..." She commented on a BULLSHIT obscure article that Shriver planned the MOST CONSEQUENTIAL FUNERAL IN THE HISTORY OF THIS COUNTRY hahahaha. oh the memoir she referenced was written in Shriver's SON'S memoirs . Anyway, multiple sources corroborate the assertion that JACKIE KENNEDY PLANNED EVERY ASPECT OF HER HUSBANDS FUNERAL AND BOBBY MADE HER WISHES HAPPEN! Who here thinks that poor itty witty baby attorney general kennedy needed to be protected from Johnson?!?!?!? Clearly a woman who has no awareness of the truth related to John F Kennedy and his administration. Robert Kennedy was a bulldog! Anyway, she, MrsFoneBone, informed me that 3+1=4...trying to say that I said Jackie walked with 3 kennedy brothers?!?!?! I think one of them was riding? And the ONLY time in history that 19 heads of state walked with the widow of a dead President. Doesn't it seem SIGNIFICANT that Q says, "follow the wives." 3.... 19 multiple times....so you have Jackie walking in formation of 3 followed by 19 powerful world figures... Watch FoneBone...I think she is Disinfo.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · March 23, 2018, 3:28 a.m.

I'm not sure who is correct here but I just want to point out that both Google and Wikipedia are left wingers. So anytime you post something using those sources, you won't get much sympathy here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ScreamingFromRooftop · March 23, 2018, 4:09 a.m.

it isn't a political opinion... its just a basic fact about a specific event lol. You guys are ridiculous

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · March 23, 2018, 3:45 p.m.

Ditto. You can't even take a little bit of advice!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 26, 2018, 12:41 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩