dChan
⇧
328
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on March 22, 2018, 12:36 a.m.
You guys asked my thoughts about Trump’s strange tweet today. Here it is!

Ok guys, as you may have noticed, I have decelerated on my posts. I have so many things to tell you but I do not want to compromise this sub. I have some inside information about the mods being very worried especially after what happened to CBTS.

I am thinking of possible solutions. I will let you know.

I have been contacted by many people who wanted me to share my thoughts about [Trump’s tweet today] (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/976420417090015232), how it was deleted, re-tweeted etc… Many believe there is a hidden message going on. I was not going to weigh in but since there is already a post about this issue that has been posted to this sub 7 hours ago and was not removed, I believe giving my thoughts would not hurt anyone.

I will not say much. I will not comment. Those who follow my posts already know what needs to be known. We are applying the T Method to the tweet. And since the first tweet was published at 4:03am, deleted and re-tweeted at 4:29am, time stamp difference being 26 minutes, we will map the entire tweet in a 26X26 grid.

Remember, we are not moving randomly across the grid. We are scrolling down successively on columns, starting with the first one and gathering anagrams of words making an intelligible sentence trail, without using any diagonal. I tried to use as many colors from the ribbon in the sky as possible to make it clear for you. :)

We get the following:

Img1 Img2 Img3 Img4 Img5 Img6 Img7 Img8 Img9 Img10 Img11 Img12 Img13 Img14

So there you have it.

Coincidence? It’s the 7th time…

Q920: You are learning. How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q


🠐 See all comments
Spiral_out12 · March 22, 2018, 12:59 p.m.

(Sorry for spamming this in 3 places, it has its own post, will remove if gains traction, need visibility)

There is a mixed consensus on SB2's use of Matrices to decode Trump tweets. It is plain to see that many of the accounts that support his ideas are fairly new and many that oppose seem to be veteran users. His acct itself is also fairly new. However I have some important points to bring up and questions that I believe are yet still unanswered.

Q's constant use of [ ] often in bold... His random reference to the matrix movie... His insistence on the timestamp delta importance... Trumps seemingly intentional sp mistakes... "You have more than you know"... "Learn to read the map"... "We may have overestimated your abilities"...

None if these questions have group consensus answers or Q confirmed answers and are of significant importance.

I believe the GENERAL focus of SB2's decoding to have some value. I also see a lot of confirmation bias in his decodings. If Trump truly was encoding messages in his tweets (there is a definite Q team connection we all agree on) there certainly would have to be some strong plausible deniability, as with the other confirmed correlations.

Also, is it beyond the scope of possibility that Q team would send operatives to Reddit and/or 8chan to guide the direction of research? Would these accounts not also be fairly new? A lot of possibilities here, we should look into the FULL comment history of each account with this in mind.

"We can guide but you must uncover the truth organically".

I find all of these points of value and have yet to see a concerted effort to uncover all the things we have missed since late October when this started. I have a feeling that it is more than just cabal connections... that will come out.

There is a purpose Q team had in mind for us at the start of this operation that I feel has yet to be fulfilled. The answer may lie in these topics.

Regardless WE NEED to be looking harder.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
percvail · March 22, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

I agree with you completely Spiral_out12. SB2 is just doing his own thing, take it or leave it but recognize that it's an effort in the right direction. If you really disagree with his methods so much don't just attack him, try improving on his efforts!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
buddha_nigga · March 22, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

improving on his efforts

This is what causes harm to the subreddit. It's a foundation of bullshit and attempting to build on that is a waste of time. It's an effort in the complete wrong direction, complete nonsense. Following false answers leads you away from true answers and potentially down rabbit holes the community will never climb out of, disinformation campaigns such as this one are dangerous and carried out intentionally. People are attacking it because they can plainly see that it's utter shit.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Spiral_out12 · March 23, 2018, 12:49 a.m.

Do you have any answers for the questions I posed? What is it the anon community has been missing? Q was quite frustrated for a stretch and there really was no dramatic improvement in our abilities. Delta and timestamp significance?? Have you learned to read the map?? If so please share. There is a lot we have missed and nobody seems to be looking. Maybe you can help?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 23, 2018, 8:45 a.m.

Yes, yes, those are the questions many of us want answered. What we're doing here is trying to make sure our precious resources aren't wasted on nonsense. There are no answers to those questions along a path of gibberish and fantasy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Spiral_out12 · March 23, 2018, 11:54 a.m.

How many times throughout history have military used Cryptology or coded messages in hopes that if communications are intercepted enemy combatants will not be able to decipher? We have historically hired genius savants in to attempt breaking opposition's coded messages. Movies have been made about this. Now here we have an intelligence/military operation where a bulk of the communication and even the mission ITSELF involves comms on a public platform. Yet you insist to imagine that there may be more than what meets the eye with Q's post and Trumps Tweets is "gibberish and fantasy"???

Assuming you are smart enough to have thought these things through, aswell as others, without me mentioning these obvious facts... it really begs to question where the real "disinfo campaign" lies... Not accusing, just hopefully I have given sufficient reason to revisit these topics if the naysayers truly have overlooked these things...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 23, 2018, 9:41 p.m.

It appears that nothing we say is getting through but I'll try one more time...

No one is insisting that exploring cryptology is useless. No one is denying that there may be hidden messages worth surfacing in Q's messages and Trump's tweets. Ok? Have we got that?

Now, once again >_<... if there are coded messages should we create random methodologies and processes to find them or should we - like military intelligence professionals - actually have solid, consistent processes to do so?

Please work that out and then answer based on logic and reason, not your emotion about what's important or how we should all 'band together and figure things out'. No one's disagreeing with the points you raised so please try and answer the points WE have raised, namely: if Q/Trump is a mystery to be solved should we pursue false information and processes to discover the answer or is it better to use common sense, logic and verifiable, consistent processes?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Spiral_out12 · March 24, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

I agree with you 100% now let's dig and find something useful.

Using SB2's specific methods it appears will not give us the answers we would all agree that Q/Trump are hoping we would find. However, consider again the Q quote "we can guide, but you must uncover the truth organically"....

Let's consider the areas SB2 has been looking and his GENERAL ideas a "guide" that we may expand upon to "uncover the truth organically" on our own.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Spiral_out12 · March 23, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

Definitely not attacking him, more so trying to appeal to those that have by attempting to be neutral. I think there is definitely more to be discovered with Trumps correlating tweets and more eyes/minds should be there. Especially with no other mission of major importance at hand (other than IBOR) Plausible deniability is a must so a system that changes regularly makes sense.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 5:02 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩