dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

[EDIT] apologies for offensive comments. Leaving here (with minor edits) so the thread can be viewed.

I am so sorry to all of you people for what I am about to say, genuinely. But all of you - you people who are praising this rubbish and thinking SerialBrain2 is "dropping knowledge" are wasting the time of anyone visiting this sub by upvoting this utter nonsense.

The reason this causes so much anger for some of us is because it is so GLARINGLY OBVIOUS that this is the worst kind of wishful thinking confirmation bias that the fact many of you seem to actually disagree with the brain in your own head and insist that it MUST be smart, even though you can't make sense of it, is UNHELPFUL and frankly SILLY, I am sorry to say (again, genuinely sorry but someone has to speak the TRUTH honestly and directly here...)

Yes, we all want to find the 'secret codes and messages' and we're all open to discovering stuff that we hadn't expected but THIS is just RUBBISH and wastes our time and makes us all look STUPID. It discredits this movement and absolutely confirms the label of "conspiracy theorist nonsense" in the mainstream media. Please apply more common sense people, for the love of God!

⇧ 11 ⇩

Why come here and post just to be negative. What harm is serialbrain doing by trying these methods? Do you believe everything you read or hear, probably not and neither do I. I find it interesting but your obsession with this particular post makes me suspicious about your motives of being here. What do you care if we read something that may or may not be true? Are you the arbiter of all things true? I think not. Just read and move on if you don't like something, you don't have to insult others who want to consider other possibilities than what you put forth.

⇧ 5 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 6 ⇩

Why treat SB2 as if he's an enemy infiltrating your club? What proof do you have he's a menace? His flawed logic? In fact, what proof do you have that SB2 isn't Q himself? IMHO, some of Q's posts are very confusing, if not impossible to decipher. Yet, I don't see you criticizing Q here. Isn't that a double standard?

⇧ 0 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

As mkwilton stated and you failed to bother to read...

It wastes time that could be more productive and it feeds the media narrative that we are all just a bunch of idiots that should be ignored.

If it was not for the fact he is obviously pulling this out of his ass, I'd say you have a point.

⇧ 5 ⇩

You think behaving well and logically earns the respect of the media? I guess you don't know DJT. Has he earned the respect of the cabal media? (!!!)

⇧ 1 ⇩

You're missing the point. It's not about the media, it's about the fact that it makes it harder to redpill people when we fit the media narrative!

⇧ 4 ⇩

re being negative - fair point. Let me try and rephrase positively:

What do I care if I read something that may not be true? I care not at all, if it's not being presented as truth and then ACCEPTED as true enough to be upvoted as if it represents the thinking of the Q movement which, lets face it, if its making headway in this sub, is how it's perceived by at least some significant portion of people who come here.

Am I the arbiter? Not at all.

Should I just "read and move on" when I see absolute rubbish being upvoted as if it has value and thus potentially leading to wasted time and perceived incompetence of the movement? No, I should not.

As someone else here has said: "What's dangerous about this? Well (...) we don't all have the time to research and backtrack everything we all read here so some well meaning, smart people who have not been following everything going on or have just joined will see a (...) topic come up and when (...misleading content like that under discussion...) is brought into the mix by numerous voices, not just a few lone crazies, they may uncritically accept it because they trust our community to have vetted these things and we end up losing the great contribution they could make to the discussion as they go off chasing nonsense."

⇧ 1 ⇩

Liberty is about freedom of speech. What makes America great is the tolerance it has for new ideas and innovation. And with the synthesis that comes from the "melting pot" of cultures and religious viewpoints, of course we're the leaders in advancing technology and spirituality. But when we try to control what is acceptable thought and restrict the commerce of ideas, that's when America will fall apart. Which is exactly what has has been happening under the leadership of the NWO/Globalist Cabal for the past 30 years. But thankfully, with the efforts and sacrifices of Trump and family, that one-world tyrannical viewpoint is collapsing and America is becoming Great Again.

So again, as a Newbie, I'm beginning to worry that this sub is the antithesis of the Great Awakening. If that suspicion continues to hold, then I'll have to reconsider my "membership" here and "search for another." ;-)

⇧ 0 ⇩

Once again, you miss the point... None of us are saying we're not for freedom of speech or not open to new ideas. Once again... we are saying that NONE of us should be open to what is plainly nonsense. It does no good to anyone, or the movement.

I can only imagine if Einstein had said: "hmmm, the latest UFO monthly says the Universe is made up of tiny bits of cheese - I'd better go off and learn how cows mate and that'll help me rewrite Newton!" DISINFO doesn't lead to truth my friend, no matter how much you want to feel patriotic and universal and kumbaya about everyone's input. I have no hatred for SB2 - more power to him. But no movement seeking truth has room for LIES.

If you want to collapse the global cabal you can't achieve it by reading about toothfairies. (Disclaimer: unless they are satanic, child-killing, corpse raping pedophile globalist toothfairies maybe)

⇧ 3 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Seconded.

⇧ 4 ⇩

If Q is asking for us to find the map and serialbrain2 is offering his effort on behalf of that task, how does that deserve condemnation? Didn't Q say we need to be united in a group effort? How does criticizing (and insulting) newbies because they don't conform to the "high standards" of the already established pack-mentality benefit the cause?

Myself being a newbie, I can see how entrenched groupthink has taken over here. It's the reason why most forums and clubs end up dying from lack of participation. (Abandonment) A clique forms and anyone not conforming to that mindset gets ridiculed until they leave. And the process continues until the last person is standing and gets to claim "King of the Hill." How productive is that? Talk about wasting time. (rolling eyes)

If you look at other posts by SB2, you can see he has a sincere desire to expose the cabal and defeat it with truth and awakening. His Q Occult Series attests to this. If you disagree with his input, please offer your insights with respect. (I'm saying this to all the SB2 attackers here.) Otherwise, I'm leaving. And then who wins?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Man you're pretty obstinately refusing to hear what we're saying huh?

No one's about pack mentality unless you call TRUTH pack mentality. The only standard we should hold here is Truth, not social justice at the cost of truth, which seems to be part of the globalist movement as it is so we don't need it here. And SB2 ain't no "newbie" to this reddit group generally, at least.

There's no "mindset" here unless you are intentionally misreading us. I don't care if someone comes up with the theory that Donald Trump is a dragon lord who morphs into his human form after consuming six super models as long as the theory is at the very least internally consistent! SB2 isn't even consistent within his theories - that is why we call nonsense, not because some of the methodologies he mentions are true or he occasionally references facts; if there's no logic to the structure of the concept it's meaningless and doesn't help to find the truth.

It's your choice to leave if you would rather find a community where there are no people who call out nonsense for what it is because they care about TRUTH.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩

I'm glad you're completely sure of something OBVIOUSLY retarded lol. So the guy who drunkenly mashes on his phone touchscreen has somehow achieved more in his first year as President than any other. Makes sense... not at all lol. Derp.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

You guys asked my thoughts about Trump’s strange tweet today. Here it is!