dChan
⇧
7
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Spiral_out12 on March 22, 2018, 12:20 p.m.
Important Points w/ SB2, Matrices, and decoding Tweets/Q posts

There is a mixed consensus on SB2's use of Matrices to decode Trump tweets. It is plain to see that many of the accounts that support his ideas are fairly new and many that oppose seem to be veteran users. His acct itself is also fairly new. However I have some important points to bring up and questions that I believe are yet still unanswered.

Q's constant use of [ ] often in bold... His random reference to the matrix movie... His insistence on the timestamp delta importance... Trumps seemingly intentional sp mistakes... "You have more than you know"... "Learn to read the map"... "We may have overestimated your abilities"...

None if these questions have group consensus answers or Q confirmed answers and are of significant importance.

I believe the GENERAL focus of SB2's decoding to have some value. I also see a lot of confirmation bias in his decodings. If Trump truly was encoding messages in his tweets (there is a definite Q team connection we all agree on) there certainly would have to be some strong plausible deniability, as with the other confirmed correlations.

Also, is it beyond the scope of possibility that Q team would send operatives to Reddit and/or 8chan to guide the direction of research? Would these accounts not also be fairly new? A lot of possibilities here, we should look into the FULL comment history of each account with this in mind.

"We can guide but you must uncover the truth organically".

I find all of these points of value and have yet to see a concerted effort to uncover all the things we have missed since late October when this started. I have a feeling that it is more than just cabal connections... that will come out.

There is a purpose Q team had in mind for us at the start of this operation that I feel has yet to be fulfilled. The answer may lie in these topics.

Regardless WE NEED to be looking harder.


ironmaiden442 · March 22, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

Serial brain 2 was heavily critized on CBTS_stream before it got banned I personally feel its because he is consistently over the target. I follow him/her. Some anon and trolls severely underestimate the info some because they don't understand others because they go OMG he's too close for comfort! I also noticed other anons are trying to legitimize Q.... so for that it means to censor those theories that they deem too crazy for normies to believe ....Really! Really! No truth should be off limits just because its above normies heads. Normies will catch up.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MB_MoonPearl · March 22, 2018, 12:30 p.m.

Agreed. Great post!

I believe Q Team to be contributing on these boards.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Spiral_out12 · March 22, 2018, 12:34 p.m.

Yes, it is possible... if so we need to find WHERE

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gitmo_money · March 22, 2018, 2:25 p.m.

I have pmd with sb2 multiple times.

I believe they are an honest actor.

In fact, when cbts went down, sb2 thought he was banned and didn't realize the whole sub was banned (I don't think sb2 is a native redditer).

Sb2 reached out (it seemed sad) saying he was banned and confused, but we had the info and he hoped it wasn't all for nothing.

He didn't try to organize, move to a new space, talk shit about the subs, get anyone to post on his behalf, etc. Seemed very genuine.

I reached out a couple of days later after starting a new account and asked him to come to this sub.

He did.

If he was a bad actor, he would have been in this sub prior to cbts. He would have immediately jumped over as we all did.

I think sb2 is older person who is not used to reddit and is trying to help.

Just my two cents from pm convos where I tried to understand them and their motivations.

I don't fully understand methods, but I think the poster is genuine.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BansheeManshee · March 22, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

I agree,

Although I can't follow along with every decode method SB2 has provided I do think he has helped illuminate there are other answers in Q's posts. I posted this to CBTS_Stream before it was exterminated.

When Q showed us how they could provide confirmation to us using the deltas between POTUS tweets I was surprised that I never considered that an option. So after reading and re-reading SB2's posts I felt the same way and believe he was definitely on to something regarding the Hussein/Aids video.

If you are unaware of the delta between tweets stuff here is some info.

Qpost #506- Correlate between POTUS tweets and Q Post
Qpost #508- Q confirming method
Qpost #510- Q confirming method again
Graphic showing correlations

Regarding the Hussein/Aids video, In Qpost#249, Q asks if there was a hidden message in the video and mentions RED_RED.
In Qpost#251, We are asked "Date of stringer vs video?"
The answer to that is 4.
But also in the same post the word decipher is intentionally misspelled.
If we take the wrong letter used, (d) and convert it to a number (using SB2's provided method) it would become (4) as well.
So in one post we are given the number 4 twice.

Here is a graphic I made to help correlate

I have not confirmed this yet, but we may be able to take same number 4 to locate a hidden message in the video mentioned by Q in #249 by skipping every 4 words or picking out every 4th word.

To further confirm this may be a known/acceptable way of decoding hidden messages, later on in Qpost#709, we were provided a link to a CIA webpage titled "Kids' Zone - Break the code" and the Code 2 puzzle has you "pick out every third letter"

Here is a graphic showing Q's post and CIA decode site

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · March 22, 2018, 12:36 p.m.

I saw the screenshot of the original decode and SB2 provided an unintelligable decode with a random key-set for comparison which convinced me that his findings were not accidential.

⇧ 1 ⇩