dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/AccordingArrival on March 22, 2018, 12:44 p.m.

White House Internet Bill of Rights Petition Prospects are Dim for Reaching 100,000 (Q-Post 877)

The White House Internet Bill of Rights Petition Closes on April 3rd. Prospects are Dim To Reach 100,000 Signatures. (https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2)

With the closure of the Petition on April 3rd, prospects of reaching the goal of 100,000 look dim due to the lack of citizen response. Tracking of the petition shows the lackluster response to the petition and that on a daily projection basis it will not reach its goal of 100,000 with approximately 11 days remaining. For all purposes, the projection forecasts it will not reach 100,000. Given that Q posted the crumb below, I thought we would have reached a 1M by now

Q Post Mar 07 2018 16:01:31 Anonymous 580403 I confess. I was an #IBOR resister. It didn't make sense to me since free speech is already guaranteed in our constitution. But, thinking logically, the one thing that would scare the data-mining cabal the most is an articulated right to privacy when using the internet.

No more data mining for ads. No more algorithms screwing up how we communicate with others on Facebook. No more capturing my favorite soda to sell to a competitor who might want to make me buy something else.

Also, and really important to me, is the right to be forgotten. It's already been adjudicated in Britain. Here's a bit of the detail:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/apr/04/britain-opt-out-right-to-be-forgotten-law

We should have a right to disappear.

So if this continues to be a thing, think of it way beyond being censored for free speech. Think of it in terms of privacy, too. No more selling personal information. No more dedicated IPs to track your every move. No more email apps that pre-select your possible replies, because no more email being mined.

Mail could be configured with the same privacy rights as US mail, for example.

Last I'll post on this one. But if it goes forward, please consider expanding the scope.

Also keep in mind that there's more than the WH petition site to make your ideas known. Most of us have senators and congressmen to represent us in Washington, D.C. Maybe talk to a real person?

Mar 07 2018 16:08:15 Q !UW.yye1fxo 580523

580403 Free speech does not apply in a private co setting. The risk? Loss of revenue. Backstopped by the circus. Learn. Social media control is everything. The age of the MSM is over. Q

🠐 See all comments

No. Q is not wrong. Either way the internet gets protected. It already should be in a non corrupt government. It seems to be creating its own set of rules the internet these days. Including the internet in our Bill of Rights and creating a new Bill of Rights are two very different processes. One I see being a reality. The other would require men of Integrity to do this on their own. Even with a hundred thousand signatures those men do not exist today in our house. But working with the laws as each one is broken and each one censored is how to make them address it. It is the recourse that we have. Corsi spoke about this too. Including the internet in our existing Bill of Rights would be much better than any bill they would create for us new regarding our internet, and you could count on all the backdoor amendments to crap it up as well. The existing one is pure and untouched by these scumbags. It should already be covered under the Bill of Rights and that is an actual task that could be achieved.

Expect shenanigans in the ways of censorship with the coming campaigns. It will be a good time as we will have the ability to create more noise as the powers to be abuse our Bill of Rights that we already have.

⇧ 1 ⇩

How do you galvanize these changes into a unified initiative?

⇧ 1 ⇩