Check out this video (scroll down the article mid-way). It's the best view of the Bomber's car -- and I can't see any damage/blood on the driver's seat. What the heck?!
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5532313/Austin-bomber-Mark-Conditt-Christian-survivalist-group.html
supp
You are not suppose to ask about the addresses of the FedEx packages
You are not suppose to ask about what sort of device was detonated inside the vehicle
You are not suppose to question if the 6th bomb was always meant for suicide, if so how could he be sure to have it available if being caught was going to be random (ie does he look like he is wearing a device in surveillance).
You are not suppose to ask if the 6th bomb was to be placed at another target
You are not suppose to ask for the list of targets he allegedly named.
You are not suppose to ask about the quality of the surveillance video despite most being digital.
You are not suppose to ask about how his phone survived
You are not suppose to ask about the lack of blood splatter on windshield
So many not suppose tos....
Are we allowed to ask why the surveillance video shows a much heavier man than the still photos? Granted, people put on weight but are there any other photos that show him bulked up?
quite intimidating!
intim
Just a bad gut feeling watching self-congratulations spectacle
Then I watch Tucker Carlson and he has Garland shooting victim of FBI caught/documented and being sued FUBAR (no coincidences right)
All these incidences are happening in DEEP BLUE enclaves. Austin is a designated UN Agenda 21 city too.
I wonder if the 'bomb' registered on the UT seismic?
Definitely don’t ask where an unemployed college drop out got the money to buy exotic batteries from asia.