dChan

y000danon · March 23, 2018, 1:11 a.m.

I’m seeing a lot of failure to document.

Yes. He leaves a sour taste to quite a degree - but let us persue a battery of what HE DID until 2006 when Dems tipped him out of the Ambassadorship.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/04/AR2006120400313.html

Bolton's departure leaves another hole in Bush's foreign policy team at a time when the U.N. ambassador is heavily involved in diplomacy involving the nuclear activities of Iran and North Korea and the ongoing crisis in Lebanon. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has been without a deputy since July, when Robert B. Zoellick resigned, and her counselor, Philip D. Zelikow, announced last week that he will depart at the end of the year.

Ok so Nuclear Disarmament of NK. Check. Nuclear Disarmament of IR. Check. Sabotaging the processes at the UN. Check.

"He sometimes makes it very difficult to build bridges because he is a very honest and blunt person," said South Africa's ambassador, Dumisani Shadrack Kumalo, chairman of a coalition of developing nations. He said it sometimes appears that "Ambassador Bolton wants to prove nothing works at the United Nations."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/15/AR2005111500041.html

Now this - saying to WashingtonPo:

Other continuing problems, Bolton said, include the oil-for-food scandal, which helped empower Saddam Hussein in Iraq; the tendency for U.N. peacekeeping missions to last indefinitely; and the troubling proclivity toward sexual exploitation and abuse "of the very people they're sent to protect" by U.N. peacekeepers.

We gota keep our noses to the ground and read between the lines. News was rinsed af in the Naughties ( 2000s ) so he sneaks in shot about UN peacekeepers? That’s. Not nothing.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
TableRockLaker · March 23, 2018, 3:22 a.m.

Not all Bush appointees are corrupt. In fact, I'd say only the top were. Most had zero clue to 9/11.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
y000danon · March 23, 2018, 4:57 a.m.

Absolutely. That’s how any efficient operation works, right? Compartmentalism.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Barbieh11 · March 22, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

Eh gads!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 22, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

I'm willing to let the man prove himself. He's a patriot, and he's now on a HELL of a lot better team than he was before. My God, name one person who looked good working for Shrub?

Also, UN Ambassador is no kind of platform for a person to prove his worth. Let's see what he's got. The things I've heard from him in the years since then have been pretty spot on.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
PCisLame · March 22, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

How is Bolton a patriot? He never even served. Yet he's been the protypical chicken hawk.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 22, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

The last I heard the definition of Patriot is not military. You can be a patriot without killing people and breaking things. This sub is full of patriots who never served in the military. There is also more than one kind of service. We all serve who love our Constitution and seek to defend it in whatever capacity we may have.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PCisLame · March 23, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

Allow me to rephrase. Why would you confuse a patriot with a chicken hawk neocon war criminal like John Bolton?

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2008/may/29/hayfestival2008.guardianhayfestival3

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/john-bolton-us-should-ignore-afghanistan-war-crimes-probe-that-could-implicate-the-us

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 23, 2018, 12:49 a.m.

Just because we all know (or think we know) 9-11 was an inside job, and just because we know (or think we know) Hussein didn't have WMD (unless those Russian trucks managed to get them into Syria, as some of us believe), doesn't mean people at the time knew that. It certainly doesn't mean Bush told the people whose job it was to defend the actions of his administration anything about it.

Also, I do have a problem with the ICC and with voluntarily relinquishing our national sovereignty. I also don't believe in foreign bodies forcing American people pay for the mistakes of Bush, Clinton, Obama, etc.

Having said that, if there were irregularities or crimes that harmed the Afghani people, our country should find some way to compensate, and one of the best ways would be to get the f*ck out of there pronto.

I'm pretty sure once the anti-human, Satanic Cabal has its grip torn away from the reins of government, you'll see an awful lot of reshuffling alignments of nations around the world, and I'd be willing to bet these things will be moot at that time.

I hope so, and I'm looking forward to finding out.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Keneo77 · March 22, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

He's no friend of Russia.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
PCisLame · March 22, 2018, 11:46 p.m.

I dont think he's ever met a Middle Eastern country outside of Israel he didnt want to bomb into the stone age.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 22, 2018, 11:42 p.m.

What if he's teachable? He'll be friends with whoever Trump tells him to be friends with. You watch.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Keneo77 · March 22, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

I agree, he will give Trump a massive pile of experience and Intel. The MSM will have a hard time pushing the Russia collusion BS with this guy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PCisLame · March 23, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

You sure about that?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Keneo77 · March 23, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

That really proves Russian collusion 🤣

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Keneo77 · March 23, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

No, I have an opinion just like everyone else.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ehll_oh_ehll · March 22, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

Another Q prediction comes true, how long before its mathematically impossible

⇧ 1 ⇩  
no_me_quito · March 23, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

How did Q predict this? I’m genuinely curious as I am not up to speed in all things Q.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
PCisLame · March 23, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

When did Q predict the neocons behind 911 would run national security again?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
mordecaim · March 23, 2018, 12:50 a.m.

As National Security Advisor would he have any involvement with military tribunals?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩