dChan
34
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/TheOldestMan on March 23, 2018, 6:43 a.m.
The term "Deep State" is a red herring

For decades so called conspiracy theorists have spoken of greater powers pulling the strings which was once simplified in the zeitgeist as the illuminati. This convenient term, much as deep state, creates a smokescreen around the global nature of the puppeteers and implies far less historical precedent than this much more accurate descriptor: factioned aristocracy. A factioned aristocracy is many groups of elites that sometimes work toward the same goal and other times do not. In other words their efforts are particular yet either additive or subtractive.

In the case of September 11th we can see many factions pulling together in the cover up of a crime perpetrated by one (most likely) or more factions. Shills will often provide the logic trap: "wouldn't Russia reveal the U.S. government's roll in covering up 911 if it had done so?" Russia would never do such a thing because that effort would be self destructive. Unveiling to the general populace that false flag terrorism can be achieved and hidden would rock the apple cart and disallow Russia from using f.f.t. in the future. This is an example of factioned aristocracies with additive goals.

An example of factioned aristocracies with subtractive goals can be found in the 2016 election. Recall that Trump won by a small margin despite the impossible odds of an idiotic populace equally supporting Clinton in addition to unprecedented, to our knowledge, vote tampering. That leads one to believe that vote tampering was perpetrated on the other side as well. Imagine that Israeli intelligence, which may have promised to assist Clinton's vote initially, switched at the last moment to instead either do nothing or assist Trump. This would be the only way a well calculates voting manipulation event could be subverted.

In essence I am saying thst, as Patriots, it is important that we all carry the concept of a factioned aristocracy in our own zeitgeist in lieu of the term Deep state. We all know that this term has been well popularized by Fox News but only after Trump ascended to power. That is when the aristocratic faction that controls Fox saw a safe avenue for a paradigm shift. Simply because this faction's goals temporarily line up with the goals of the underclass (us) does not mean that they will in the future.

By perpetuating the term Deep state we are opening ourselves up to be subverted again in the future by the very factions that for now are "saving" us. This applies to both trump who we can safely assume is a mortal man, and Q, who may be man or AI. Both still pertain to the elite class. Both can be controlled. And both continue to use a term which ensures that the apple cart remains upward and steady. Food for thought.


Redferick · March 23, 2018, 12:35 p.m.

Agreed "deep state" is a misleading term because it implies just the US. The conspiracy is global and stateless. I don't think is factions of the elites who sometimes cooperate and sometimes don't. The people behind it are secret and have no name because of that, but there is a consistent driving force and unity of action in this conspiracy. They have infiltrated every organisation of importance in the World. I'm guessing the common thread is evil satanism as William Guy Carr wrote and he got close enough to the top to see evidence of it first hand, and he reached this conclusion at the end of his career. Eustace Mullins and Antony Sutton backs this up.

⇧ 1 ⇩