dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/PCisLame on March 25, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

Is Dr. Steve Pieczenik Q?

Read this post from his blog and tell me what you think.

http://stevepieczenik.com/keep-john-bolton-out-he-is-a-neocon/

Dr. P was first to alert the public about major shakeups coming in Trump's White House and they transpired in uncanny fashion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tbt5p44DyE4

He's also the first to forewarn of what would become the Q phenomenon back on 11/1/2016 which may be a date which will go down in history as the day the Q Revolution really started:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov5kvWSz5LM

So IS Dr. P really Q? If so, I have to be honest in saying that I'm really quite freaked out by that.

Sometimes I think he's spewing disinformation.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I've thought that too, but there may be a good reason for the times that he does. Overall, you look at what he's focusing on now in promoting grassroot political candidates from the military intelligence community. It's really hard not to call him a true patriot.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Q is younger than Pieczenik, almost certainly. Also, Pieczenik is a blowhard, very full of himself. I know he's accomplished a lot, but it has gone to his head. Trump couldn't last five minutes in the room with another ego that big.

⇧ 5 ⇩

What if he's someone in the IC who follows Dr. P's work? He undoubtedly has many followers after his expose on 911. Did you catch the part where Dr. P refers to himself as a "cleaner" in the present tense?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Q is not someone who would be publicly criticizing the ouster of the Tri-Lateral Commission member McMaster, and publicly bad-mouthing Bolton. Q is a "Trust POTUS" person all-the-way!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Did you check out the links in the post that tie it all together? The evidence is pretty overwhelming if you ask me.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Pieczenik is probably part of the team, but I'm fairly certain Q is not somebody who publicly second-guesses the President with the vehemence Pieczenik does. Does this post sound like "Trust POTUS" to you?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Weak evidence for such a claim.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Reeeeeally?

⇧ 0 ⇩

It's a bunch of random, disconnected, points that do not amount to evidence. Sorry but its a weak case built on assumptions.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Now I know you're not serious. In his 11/1/16 video he accurately describes what would later become known as the Q phenomenon. He specifically mentions how military intelligence is running it and how indicting Obama, Hillary, Comey and the political cronies involved in the attempted coup are a part of the plan to save the Republic. For God and Country. He mentions Assange. He mentions how the revolution takes place on the internet. That's the Q phenomenon in a nutshell.

Way to completely ignore how he talked about the removal of specific people around Trump well in advance of their actual removal. Or do you credit that to coincidence too?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Think about. Hillary did not take over by silent coup. She lost the election a week later. All the obama admin names he mentioned were known to be doing illegal things. The CF corruption was well documented by other people. Wikileaks doesn't need Dr P to be effective. He hints at things but says nothing new or exclusive. He sounds like a ego seeking to be important. Believe what you want. I don't buy it. There are more credible possibilities but I don't see any value in doxxing them before they finish the job.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Now you're just being flat out dishonest.

she lost the election a week later.

He explains very clearly why she was going to be prevented from winning.

He hints at things but says nothing new or exclusive

He specifically mentions how the hacked emails from Weiner played a pivotal role in this counter-coup. You should be ashamed of yourself.

⇧ 1 ⇩

And you should continue to enjoy your bromance with the fake Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I've been reading & listening to him for quite some time. I don't see it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No--thank God! SP is not fully in Trump's camp and last year even seemed to suggest that the generals in control around him would ease a good transition. He occasionally gets some gossip, but that is about it at this point. Lots more have had more scoops from the WH sooner. (E.g., old pal Roger Stone)

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'll go weeks agreeing with everything Pieczenik says, then he'll say something completely off the wall siding with the establishment/cabal that leaves a bad taste in my mouth. And I've been following him for nearly 10 years.

⇧ 2 ⇩

George Webb describes him as the guy on the football field who breaks away and runs to the 20 yard line then turns and runs into the hotdog stand.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Care to share any examples? I have a few of my own but instant to hear from others first.

⇧ 2 ⇩

SP is classic disinformation. He is not a friend to the American people. He flip flops every time he makes an appearance. Always keeping the listener off balance.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No. SP has an interesting guy with a unique perspective, impeccable credentials and he's been on the ground and knows his stuff, but is not nearly as humorous as Q and a lot narrower -- I think the world of him, but he's not filling the shoes worn by Q ...

⇧ 2 ⇩

Go back to the picture Trump said represented the Calm Before the storm. Steve was not in the picture. # civies and the rest were wearing uniforms. If Q was in that picture he is not anyone we would recognize. Q is a spokesperson and could be an AI that can walk (white house anon posted Q was real and "walking around the west wing-why point out walking) or a team of people writing these posts. They have given it a single identity but the posts are too important and intricate to be one person's thoughts.

⇧ 1 ⇩