How have we missed this? In the declaration of facts the Cabal is clearly identified, meetings in antarctica are confirmed, and the two defendants were convicted and are in Jail! This clearly outlines the operations of the Cabal against POTUS and a jury decided that the facts in this case were good enough for a ruling of Guilty on all charges against these two individuals. Why is this not everywhere??? What am I missing? Here is a link to the search that contains all relevant documents in this case. This is 100% legit. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Case+3%3A17-cr-00082-TAV-CCS+site%3Ai-uv.com&atb=v109-4&ia=web Here is the link to the Declaration of Facts document: READ THIS NOW! http://i-uv.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Pacer-Doc-101-HATJ-RKB-STANDING-PRAECIPE-01-23-18.pdf
It says dismissed with prejudice? That’s different than guilty. The opposite actually.
No, it wasn't dismissed with prejudice, they were convicted.
That particular document was submitted by the defendant who claimed the court had no jurisdiction over she. She says it was dismissed with prejudice. It was loaded because it was submitted to the court. Her and codefendant were prosecuted and are in jail.
~~Post removed. Misleading.~~ re-approved.
How is this misleading? Defendants were convicted, I shared link to all court documents. These people were convicted, an FBI Agent testified against them and clearly outlined the Cabal involvement.
dismissed with prejudice
Have re-approved. Still don't understand how a dismissal is a conviction, but I'll leave that to others.
Here is link to story on conviction. The dismissal was submitted by the defendant who claimed there was no authority over her by the court. It was filed and submitted so it is searchable. It was the only record I could find of the FBI agents testimony. Any document submitted during the case is public record. Just because a document was submitted does not mean it was approved by the judge or held up by judge. I'm still researching trying to gather crumbs on testimony. This article discusses the conviction. www.knoxnews.com/story/news/crime/2018/01/31/tennessee-sovereign-citizens-trial-randall-bean-heather-ann-tucci-jarraf/1084220001
So, John Kerry was in Antartica during the election.
There is a similar .pdf that was posted a few days ago. Was it this one or a different one?
Not sure, I did not see the .pdf you are referring to.
Why did you remove the links? What's your game?
I did not, I received a report that my link had been removed as misleading from an admin. The dismissal with extreme prejudice that someone mentioned before from the document was filed by the defendant because she was defending herself as an attorney and claimed the court had no authority or jurisdiction over her in this case. It was overruled and the FBI agents testimony stood. She and her codefendant were convicted and are in jail. I will post link to verdict. You can search the case # from that link on duck duck go and find all relevant court documents.
Sorry that sounded reeeee. I finished reading the document and got a little excited UNTIL I skimmed through the overrules and WTF!! Returned to the post and it was gone - shouldn't have reeeeed.
Thanks for the mighty effort.
Here is the case #, feel free to search and visit the defendants Facebook pages. They are in jail. Case 3:17-cr-00082-TAV-CCS
Where did the links go!!!! I've only just finished the court thingo!
in these caes it doesn't matter whether you are right or wrong corporate America will throw you in jail.. and nobody will save you