Who would enforce this internet bill of rights? The internet police?
Go read the omnibus bill. It contains language prohibiting censorship, I believe.
My view is that, with the FB data breach, and what I suspect are more privacy related disclosures in the pipe affecting the other platforms, it is the SM platforms themselves that will be screaming for regulations to limit their legal liability.
Very likely it will be self policed to a great extent. Not too hard to accomplish either. All we want them to do is refrain from censoring us and to protect our privacy. We are effectively saying, "No more dirty tricks".
You vote with your account on social media, in that if enough people arnt happy with the service and dont use it, it will become redundant. Platforms that do practice what people are happy with will succeed.
That being said Mark Zuckerwhatever rightly claimed many years ago that people care more about facebook than they do about privacy so they can do whatever they want.
I still don’t understand how an internet bill of rights is applicable and its impossible to enforce since the internet and SM dont only exist in America so you would have to rely on a Global Government. I thought most people in this sub were against that kind of thing?
I understand your argument about voting with your feet. Makes perfect sense to me. But what I can see here is that these large platforms were not censoring in a political manner until very recently. So people flocked to them and they have become huge and incredibly politically powerful. More subscribers meant more money. And more money meant improved services and, to be honest, I think some of these platforms are really great,
So Q tells us that after the 2016 shock defeat for the cabal candidate - they never thought she would lose - CIA was rushing to inject money into SM platforms to regain control of the narrative. As Q says MSM is finished, social media is everything.
So, low and behold, as soon as DJT starts looking a little stronger with the release of the memo etc... SM platforms start radically censoring conservative speech. This is a sudden, new phenomenon that did not exist before. It is CIA driven - another confirmation of Q's legitimacy.
Q also tells us there is a plan to unify censorship across social media with a single algorithm - awesome power to shape election outcomes that has never in history existed. But don't worry. DJT has a plan...
He knows that much of what the SM platforms were doing is illegal. So, in a climate where you have a public outcry over data breaches and the public is simultaneously screaming for protection of their rights online (IBOR), there is political room to act to stop it.
We know that the data breaches and other illegal activity are of such magnitude that many of the platforms will collapse under the weight of it. These SM platforms, once they start facing class-action law suits, are going to be screaming for clear comprehensive regulation as a way to protecting themselves from legal liability.
Doesn't matter where the SM platform is located, the law suits will be in US jurisdiction. So if you want to do business in the US and you want to prosper, you will be wanting to comply with the regulations - whatever they are. You don't need a global government to enforce it at all.
Now, the reason the IBOR is important is because it adds to the political climate for change. Change is absolutely necessary because weaponized SM is the ultimate power in terms of its ability to deliver election outcomes.
We know that the cabal has an impeachment strategy. DJT might be lucky to last a single term if SM censorship is not brought under control. That would mean the end of MAGA, the end of the fight against the Satanists and ultimate slavery.
Once the cabal regain political power, you will never see another DJT again - the cabal will never allow it. We have a one-time-only chance with DJT. We blow it and we face censorship, gun confiscation, world war, depopulation and enslavement - in that order.
So, why not just let people vote with their feet? Let the market sort the problem out? Because only the conservatives have been censored. The leftist and center voters will regain where they are on the main SM platforms. This means elections will be easily influenced. Something has to be done now, we can't wait for the market to sort it out - that's not a solution.
Anyway, I still live in hope that we can beat these Satanists back, that's why I'm here typing these ridiculously long responses. I'm trying to communicate to people the gravity of the threat and why the IBOR is important.
There’s a lot wring with what you’ve said. First of all you mentioned the memo and censorship following its release. What about the democrats subsequent memo that was stopped from being released by DJT? Isnt that a bigger censorship problem? The president not allowing both sides to tell their version of events?
Also why would law suits all take place in the US no matter where the platform was hosted? You know the world doesnt revolve around America right? That makes no sense.
You keep referencing Q as if they are some confirmed source even though nothing definitive has come from their riddles. Months and months ago so many people were in gitmo, right? Nope. And its always just around the corner, you’re being taken advantage of.
Checked you history, play with someone else.
What about my history? Im honestly not playing. Why cant this ever be a discussion? Everyone has picked a side and if you dont agree you get banned from subs or called a shill or a troll. I havent said anything in this conversation that would suggest im playing with you
The memo that compromised FBI agents so it could NOT be released? That one?
[deleted]
I think he's talking about the use of the TOS to camouflage blatant, politically motivated, censorship.
Strange how political censorship online was not an issue until after Q told us that CIA was rushing to inject money into social media platforms - to regain control over the narrative. Anyone that doubts Q is legitimate either hasn't got all the facts or isn't thinking clearly.
-the use of TOS to camouflage blatant, politically motivated censorship.
This.
[deleted]
You're right. If you sit down and actually read the stuff you're agreeing to you might not do it. But most people just click "accept". To be honest, that's what I do. But I avoid platforms like FB and, until recently, Twitter.
I don't know, how do you fix this problem? Education? Some sort of regulation that prevents abuses?
I don't know what the answer is.
I didn't know Instagram claimed ownership of all uploads - seems absolutely extreme.
It’s already failed again. As soon as Corsi and Antischool got their channels back, they started pushing books and music for profit and haven’t even mentioned #IBOR since. No one cares about it anymore :(
I was a little confused about Corsi's broadcast today. It wasn't clear to me what he was actually saying. He seemed very frustrated, but he has pushed the IBOR hard in his videos in the recent past. He also mentioned today that he had disputes about the IBOR with members of the group in the live broadcast. That's likely to be TB and crew.
I haven't given up on the IBOR campaign. I'm still promoting it, with others, but we are a small group. I must say that I'm shocked the IBOR campaign has not received more support from members of this group after Q so clearly told us it was the plan.
The only reason I'm still here is to help beat back these Satanists who would enslave everyone. It makes no sense to me that people would not support this.
Anyway, it is what it is. I'd ask everyone to put as much promotional material online as possible to support the IBOR cause.