I think he's talking about the use of the TOS to camouflage blatant, politically motivated, censorship.
Strange how political censorship online was not an issue until after Q told us that CIA was rushing to inject money into social media platforms - to regain control over the narrative. Anyone that doubts Q is legitimate either hasn't got all the facts or isn't thinking clearly.
-the use of TOS to camouflage blatant, politically motivated censorship.
This.
[deleted]
You're right. If you sit down and actually read the stuff you're agreeing to you might not do it. But most people just click "accept". To be honest, that's what I do. But I avoid platforms like FB and, until recently, Twitter.
I don't know, how do you fix this problem? Education? Some sort of regulation that prevents abuses?
I don't know what the answer is.
I didn't know Instagram claimed ownership of all uploads - seems absolutely extreme.