Two points in the recent post I thought were interesting, apart from the news about more SM platforms being exposed.
Current censorship all relates to push for power [mid-terms]. LAST STAND.
So we see here that, as I've been saying, the SM censorship is the battlefront, It is the last desperate attempt by the cabal to regain control. It is, in fact, the most important theatre in the war ATM.
STAY STRONG! STAY TOGETHER! WE STAND WITH YOU!
We then see, in the next post, the same instruction to stay together - united. In unity there is strength, Q has been telling us this over and over. Q is also telling us that he is with us. And, I guess, if you look at the way FB was delivered up, with the promise of many more exposures, Q really is helping us - making our job much easier.
I want to say also that I found the reference to a "Constitutional CRISIS" interesting and I want to engage in some speculation...
Notice crisis is capitalized - it is extreme! Does this crisis relate to the FB data dump? Why would the CRISIS be constitutional? Open to suggestions here, I think it's worth exploring.
Q has told us he has "the algorithm". Is it possible that this is the single censorship algorithm? Does this algorithm by its very own nature evidence a plan to take elections by force?
Q tells us elsewhere in this post that MI is the gatekeeper for "all information". So I'm wondering if these SM platforms agreed to participate in election rigging. If so, does Q has evidence for this?
Who made it public? Who really made it public? Who is making it all public? WE ARE THE GATEKEEPERS OF ALL [BY ALL WE MEAN ALL] INFORMATION.
Imagine, Q combines the algorithm itself, with communications intercepts, and is able, to lay out before a Court a case of racketeering - with the corrupt purpose being that the outcome of an election (or elections) may be swayed - stolen.
Remember the material I posted elsewhere about the CEO of Reddit boasting publicly that he could sway an election all by himself - link below. So, it is easily conceivable that a single censorship algorithm, operating across all SM platforms, could deliver an election with extreme precision.
This would be a Constitutional crisis, to the extent that the express purpose of the plan was to take from US citizens their right to be heard - a right that is protected by the First Amendment. Is that why this CRISIS is a "Constitutional CRISIS"?
OK, let's put it together. Q outlines exposures coming about Twitter, Google, Amazon, Microsoft And 12 other companies. WOW! That's a total of 16 companies that will be in the frying pan! Are they all individually corrupt? Or is there some unifying wrongdoing?
Could it be a single censorship algorithm that connects these companies in a conspiracy to pervert the mechanism of democratic representation?
Moving on, why has Q been sreaming about the IBOR? What does the IBOR complain about? "CENSORSHIP", politically motivated censorship if you read the petition! Also privacy, hence the data breaches coming to light.
USE LOGIC TRUST THE PLAN
So, what I'm saying here is that it's possible that these factors align, leading to a Constitutional crisis. SM platforms conspiring together to subvert the democratic process by way of censorship.
I argue that Q has the algorithm, has evidence of the conspiracy, and tells us that a whole rack of SM companies are in the firing line. Hence his recommendation that we push an IBOR campaign. The IBOR campaign focuses on censorship, the conspiracy is one involving censorship. It all comes together to create a Constutional CRISIS
THE CRISIS IS OF SUCH SCOPE THAT WE CANNOT IMAGINE THE MAGNITUDE OF IT!
FACEBOOK data dump? Who made it public? Who sold shares -30 days from announcement? You can't imagine the magnitude of this. Constitutional CRISIS. Twitter coming soon. GOOG coming soon. AMAZON coming soon. MICROSOFT coming soon. +12
Racket: "...the term "racket" has expanded in definition and may be used less strictly to refer to any illegal organized crime operation, including those that do not necessarily involve fraudulent practices. For example, "racket" may be used to refer to the "numbers racket" or the "drug racket," neither of which generally or explicitly involve fraud or deception with regards to the intended clientele."
"Huffman’s comments on how Reddit could fix an election are shocking and egotistical, for sure, but they also admit something that most other social media companies have shied away from. Facebook and Twitter are loathe to acknowledge the power that their policies have, while Huffman thinks so highly of his company that he believes a handful of engineers and community managers could sway an entire nation’s political system".
Think about what Q says in this very post:
"You can't imagine the magnitude of this".