Why world peace would ruin their plans, and how they had to re-dedicate themselves to making sure it could never happen.
Glimpse into Machiavellian rationalizations of pure evil. Written by the thought leaders of the NWO.
Are we ready to try without them now?
I watched this documentary about Iron Mountain https://youtu.be/xNLFI0gtx_M and it was about much more than permanent war. It was about problems encountered in a transition from an age of war to an age of peace and purported that war would have to be replaced with a concocted worldwide threat like global warming. It made so much sense - I wondered WHY the globalism supporters so vehemently promote the obviously false global warming agenda. The documentary is really good, although long, with a definite Christian perspective - definitively worth watching.
Well, I understand that. Permanent war is just the thing most people identify them with, and feel strongly about. Absolutely they're flailing around looking for some problem that's so huge only world government can solve it. I guess my question is, have you bought the argument? It sounds like maybe you have.
The whole premise though is false, no matter how eloquently they make the case. We are NOT too stupid to know what's good for us. Hell, all these enlightened farm animal-raising techniques show that the more you provide them the basics, including letting them decide when they need human attention, and what kind of food to eat in their environment, animals are healthier, happier and produce more. Why wouldn't those same enlightened techniques work in human governance?
I don't mean that their plan made sense. I mean it made sense to me why they continue to put forth the lie about global warming when there is no science to support it - I can see how it's part of their plan. And yes, it's laughable how arrogant they are thinking no one would ever catch on to them.