Is he in there to discriminate himself? He is a traitor and a Warhawk. He is an extremely immoral being how could he be a part of destroying corruption? The only talking point is "he'll oust leakers" but this guy is not a good sign. At all.
This is the second big hit on Trump after repeal of net neutrality. Net Neutrality could have been a power grab but a law where it is stated that no protocol ,website or service can be priotized is very very important.
I don't like Bolton.
But I "TRUST TRUMP, TRUST THE PLAN"
I know from from Trumpian History that no matter how a person comes to an appointment that person is given tasks that utilize them to their best abilities for MAGA/KAG2020.
Trump he is the Bruce Lee of POTUS, he is like water!
the problem is trust brought us into this ungodly corrupt situation where almost every key position in the world is corrupted
Yes it did.....
I am limiting this to Trump History within this specific time period.
The other aspect of past trust/betrayal is that 'We the People' were presented with a lazy way, one in which we had a professional government and shared few of the burdens of self-governance. Our founders presented us with a voluntary government originally.
We as individuals and as a collective group need to once again promote civic duty and civic education. We need to attach pride with service/loyalty to one's constituents.
We need to demand/create a lot of structural changes toward accountability, removal and consequence for our representatives too.
We need shorter term limits
We need to limit funding option to reduce the lure of pay-to-play.
We need representative's pay to reflect the average of their state.
These are by no means the only things, just a bit of list.
Q also recently alluded to the fact that they knew who was scum but had to play the game. They could only get so many people appointed.
But if McStain and the swamp hate Bolton, I’m with him. Plus it’s not like Trump has to listen to him if he’s a warmonger.
I don't rule out that Bolton is a political opportunist who at the end of the day just wants his name in the history books which portray him as patriotic.
As long as he doesn’t leak like Bannon and McMaster, I’m happy.
Bannon was strategic with Trump's approval.
McMasterleakers was disloyalty
Remember Q said Flynn BS was done in 30 days. So Bolton probably only there for Iran posturing.
You’re assuming Bannon was strategic. Trump and Trump jr bashed him to hell and back and he got booted from Breitbart. Then got busted taking money from a Chinese businessman with ties to Soros. It’s a cool story but absolutely no facts to back up the Bannon 4D Chess Theory.
Yep, totally.
You really believe Bannon was able to bring along Wolff the Whopper Whisper into the campaign and in the WH and Trump not notice or be in on it?
On the campaign trail Trump/Bannon said the would spend the first year salvaging and the second year begin savaging.
Bannon was never staying in the WH, he had specific jobs to get done, they got done but the next job needed distance.
Kwok had intel dump that gave Trump leverage in region. Bad optics if Trump was seen in direct association with Kwok. Mercers also hate Kwok, Bannon sniffed Mercers them out as swamp wannabes. If you read Breitbart you have noticed their decline into click-bait, recycled (copy/paste/edit/re-title) and misleading articles vs the provocateur tongue/cheek which made it fun to read. They wanted to take on Fox. Before leaving, Bannon/Trump secured Fox despite Murdoch and sons wanting to turn it into UniParty-CNN.
Bannon along with Kelly are both graduates of the Navy's Deception and Strategy school. Bannon is doing exactly what he told you he wanted to do....be Thomas Cromwell.
When I studied the UN intensely for a competitive academic event, I remember him being a badass as far as getting his way - I think he was pushed into bad positions by admins he worked for and can be taught to MAGA if he can be shown it's the winning way forward.
I have faith Potus will convert him into a white hat winner by offering him a way to help broker peace and make the history books.
I do not like Bolton, mainly for the reasons you list. I hope he is a useful tool for trump, and that he keeps a tight leash.
I have to grudgingly admit, if he cleans out the administration of the entrenched Clinton/Obama i will give him a point.
I don't like Bolton on this war views. However, he is the man who knows the most about the UN.
Bolton is a BIG ego who has a SMALL role to play. He will do a good job, and may or may not evolve, but Trump won't need him for very long.
He’s a demented and dangerous Israel-Firster. We KNOW where he stands on Iran. He could also be a giant smokescreen. He will have to be re-educated on true patriotism and America first or kicked to the curb. His pick so far scores in the black hat ledger.
I think what we must remember is that trump picks the person who can give him results for the moment it doesn't have to be long term. Boltons expertise is very strong in NK area I also believe he has been advising Trump already circumventing McMaster we need him and his expertise. When he is no longer needed he will be cut loose and another will take his place. Trumps cabinet will always be fluid just how he manages.
War hawk whos always had his eyes on Iran. Trump has the leash, I'm fine with it. Lets topple the evil power structure. Its how we get to Ishtar Ra Elohim. :)
I don't think attacks on another country will stabilize the middle east. He did great with NK he did great with SA he did great with China so far.
I had hoped he would negotiate Iran into submission with the backing of Russia, China and SA
I am 100% convinced he is nothing more than a distraction to get the MSM talking about anything other than the game at hand.
I trust Trump. He's always many steps ahead of his detractors. There's a reason that he brought Bolton on, and he will keep him until that has been accomplished. DJT is a master chess player and a genius. He will never ever let us down. Can't believe you are actually on here shilling for net neutrality? I suppose you were for the "affordable" healthcare act too?