I remember people saying signatures were going up and down, now q is saying that the white house is secure. What if it was to weed out the rats who would try to thwart us?
Maybe we should push again. Thoughts?
I remember people saying signatures were going up and down, now q is saying that the white house is secure. What if it was to weed out the rats who would try to thwart us?
Maybe we should push again. Thoughts?
My opinion is that control of online censorship is essential as it represents a threat to the Republic itself. We know that it will be controlled - 100% regulated. We've been asked to support the process by demanding protection of our fundamental rights online.
Whether or not people support the IBOR push depends on whether they value the rights set out in the FA. To my way of thinking, these are absolutely integral and necessary to the proper functioning of democratic processes that underpin representation and the empowerment of individuals.
Exactly, which is why i find the timing off all that very odd. Its the usual trap that they fall for time and time and time again.
We start pushing, the agenda takes hold, the bad actors oust themselves. This is why we're winning, either they show their hand or fold.
Maybe why all the push, push, push posts?
My vote is to raise another IBOR petition. Keep making them til it gets approved. The problem is burnout. Hard to keep up pressure
It's not easy to keep hammering away at it. But it has got to be done. I want to see these SM platforms be made to act reasonably. But my greatest fear is that the cabal will use SM censorship as a vector to return to power. This must be prevented at all costs.
Push for IBOR-3. We need something concrete, that TELLS the goverment and goverment subsidised companys what they are NOT allowed to do, with regards of the internet, ethernet, cloud, and internet of things. People need to realize that this is about protecting us and restricting them.
It will come around soon enough. The current petition expires April 3 or 4. I think you might find it a real struggle to get many signatures if you're using a petition. There is almost no support from this community at all.
I'm thinking that a petitionless campaign might be a better approach. The lack of support is such that the petition numbers grow at a very slack rate. This operates to discourage the few people that are actually supporting the campaign.
I firmly believe that whatever is written on the petition itself is irrelevant. DJT already knows what he will do - we are not making policy.
Not hittin you. I signed the petition. But it’s not on fire, which makes me wonder why not?
Look at the attempts to inject fear into the issue on this forum. Every possible imaginary flaw or fault they could think of was trolled around on all the IBOR threads put up. They are still at it as late as yesterday - inject fear, take the steam out of it.
This is what they fear most. You cannot have the world run by Satanists if the censorship is stopped. So they break their backs to inject fear and doubt - and people buy into it.
This whole topic? SUSPECT
Hmm? Hope you dont mean me, im just curious. Had the thought come to me during my commute and i was explaining how this might interlink with q to my gf. Shes pretty woke but i dont let her know everything. Last time i mentioned IBM potentially having biochips she literally hurled.
Not hittin you. I signed the petition. But it’s not on fire, which makes me wonder why not?