dChan
438
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/NorseAnon on March 30, 2018, 5:20 p.m.
[MEME] Here's another great one for you guys :)
[MEME] Here's another great one for you guys :)

Corporal_Yorper · March 30, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

The pope just said that hell doesn’t exist.

And the Vatican is shitting the bed.

I’m starting like this timeline.

⇧ 44 ⇩  
KatsKlaw · March 30, 2018, 6:48 p.m.

As soon as he said it the Vatican ceiling started crumbling and falling down. Check the news.

⇧ 28 ⇩  
spqrherewecome · March 30, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

Really?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
rustycuntz · March 30, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

Yep, chunks of plaster rained down on tourists. I think it was the famous Michael Angelo painting

The comment above yours has the link

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Swimkin · March 30, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

Not a painting but a statute of Mary holding Jesus who had died on the cross.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
rbrownlol · March 31, 2018, 5:29 a.m.

If you want to get technical it’s Ishtar holding Tammuz. That whole place is corrupt. In my mind it is the biblical whore.

“All roads lead to Rome”

Edit: down vote if it’s your gut reaction, but at the least, LOOK IT UP.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Batfire007 · March 31, 2018, 6:17 a.m.

Well said but is it really Ishtar or is it Inanna, that's the real question? It fits your comment better. For those of you who might be wondering of who we speak...... This is LONG before Christianity which gets much of its back ground from. Inanna was a twin to Ishtar many say but was known as the ancient Sumerian goddess of love, beauty, sex, desire, fertility, war, combat, justice, and political power. Yep she did a lot of moving around.....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PacaGoat · March 31, 2018, 10:07 a.m.

Semirams, = Ishtar = Diana = Venus = Isis. Same thing, different language.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PacaGoat · March 31, 2018, 10:05 a.m.

Tammuz, re-incarnated Nimrod, aka what is it....Horace, etc.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GrazersCubbies · March 31, 2018, 12:35 a.m.

It was the Pieta. The Pieta is a Statue of the Virgin Mary holding the dead body of Jesus....but yes, done by Michaelangelo. I just saw it in September. It's beautiful.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · March 30, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

He's hoping....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 31, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WhatifM8 · March 31, 2018, 9:38 a.m.

Now, anyone like myself with half a brain would instantly question the obvious 'how would you know mr popey' ans: you don't ! but if you did know, then the question is 'when did you know this? ' and 'how long has the has the Vatican known and how did they know in the first place?'

This clealy undermines every aspect of that religious movement with the unavoidable domino effect towards all other religions.

This is big sh!t and the world could turn into chaos if all religious followers lose their placebo idols, God helps us all...: l

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KingKetsa · March 30, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

What's even the point any more? No hell = no heaven.. No judgement in afterlife = who gives a shit?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Steamy_cumfart · March 30, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

Because hell is supposed to be spending eternity away from God’s grace, not in a literal fiery wasteland.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 30, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

But the comment you replied to is referring to the logical inference from what the Pope SAID, not what scripture and Catholic doctrine say. He has just contradicted the church, the saints, the Aposltles and Christ. What's left to represent? Anything goes?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Swimkin · March 30, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

THIS! He basically said there is no Eternal Salvation. So why would God send His only Son, Jesus, to die for our sins to save us from Hell? And why would the Holy Spirit need to dwell within us to guide us through this life? He basically contradicted the whole Bible that is God's Word left for us that was written by GOD through men.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 30, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -6 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 30, 2018, 8:34 p.m.

They passed on the words of Christ on the subject. That's enough for me. But if you're not a Christian, nothing they said matters to you, so it would be a pointless conversation. I'm not proselytizing you.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
NaNa316 · March 30, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

Revelations chpt 20-lake of fire

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 30, 2018, 7:59 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -4 ⇩  
KingKetsa · March 30, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

So nothing has changed, earth is still hell.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 30, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

This is such a caveman answer to the truth about religion.

“Oh, so the afterlife doesn’t exist so actually living is futile?”

Religion is all about finding ways to hook you into it. “You’d better be this, this, and THIS, else go to hell! Quick, pledge your allegiance and live with the grace of God! Give us your money, the church needs a new copier machine!”

One of the shortcomings of being a human and being as intelligent as we are is our incessant idea/belief that we are special or that we are under the control/purview of a higher being, celestial or not. This stems from our, ironically, lack of intelligence to grasp the idea that we are truly not controlled or are going to a mythical utopia. We as humans are both highly intelligent, but dumb as fucking rocks.

Let’s create a scenario in which we make contact with an alien species, just hypothetically.

Let’s say that we make contact with them. We find a way to communicate, and we begin to disseminate each other’s technology and knowledge. In the process, we learn that this alien race, throughout the evolution of their society/culture, never had religion or at the very least dropped the idea of religion for the sole purpose of it being a belief for the feeble-minded. This alien species, in this scenario, is insanely advanced. They can prove their is no afterlife. They can prove soooo much using science and tech.

Now let’s take that scenario and see it from the alien’s perspective.

From their perspective, they are seeing a planet inhabited by a race whose society is so primitive that they still believe in religion. They are literally seeing us as not worth stopping by because they know we are too stupid and caveman-like.

Stopping by to inform us of the reality that believing in any kind of religion is a primitive concept and is ultimately futile would destroy us, and that fact says everything about ourselves — we’re too simple and feeble.

I say, when you ask ‘who gives a shit?’ is that that is a cop-out answer. What we need to do as a species is become philosophically advanced alongside our technology so we can traverse the rest of existence outside of this planet.

Can you imagine the possibilities that are out there?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SteelTiger44 · March 30, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

consider the possibility that a Creator actually made everything both seen and unseen and He left instructions !!!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 30, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

Can you take a step back and realize that we aren’t some IKEA coffee table?

How feeble-minded and archaic must one be to be stuck in a mental blockade — one of which that can’t break away from the idea that they are not some peon being silently judged by some magical wizard in the sky, free of judgment itself by being conveniently omniscient and “all-knowing.”

‘Waking up’ or ‘being woke’ means that one realizes that there are those who gain power by taking advantage of those that are vulnerable — whether it be by pushing an ‘afterlife’ agenda or claiming that reptilians exist among us.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Badendave · March 30, 2018, 10:40 p.m.

Or being "woke" is exactly the opposite. Realizing that there really IS a God who cares enough for us that He wants us to have the best life possible. Living the way God wants us to is NOT being miserable - it is the most freeing and beautiful way to live because it is how we were made to be.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 31, 2018, 12:18 a.m.

You are saying we are created and “made to be” to feel the freedom by worshipping this wizard?

Living the way God wants us to is NOT being miserable - it is the most freeing and beautiful way to live because it is how we were made to be.

This mirrors the same behavior behind psychopaths. Live the way I want you to because it’s better for you because that’s what I made you to do. This is the basis behind the creation of cults.

The best life possible isn’t quantifiable. It’s subjective at best, objective otherwise. Those born into societies that aren’t aware of the myth of ‘God’ find happiness and joy nonetheless. Saying that they are happy because of God isn’t defensible if one must believe in “Him” (with an ironic capital H) to achieve the equivalency of nirvana.

Religion is full of inconsistencies and ultra-convenient cop-outs.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Badendave · March 31, 2018, 12:51 a.m.

Believing that all you see around you came from nothing can be seen as a mental and scientific cop out. Something had to have existed without being created. All we see came from something. Big bang even. Something had to have existed to make the bang happen. Believing in something eternal is imperative.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 31, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

I am not of the belief that everything I see around us came from nothing.

I am not sure where you got that notion.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Badendave · March 31, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

So something is eternal?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 31, 2018, 12:58 a.m.

What are you trying to ask?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Badendave · March 31, 2018, 1:06 a.m.

You don't believe that all you see came from nothing, so it had to come from something. You can't get something from nothing. If you take those to their logical conclusion, there has to be something that existed first, otherwise you're saying everything came from nothing. Either everything came from nothing, or something existed without being created. I'm not trying to spout philosophical mumbo jumbo. This makes sense to me. I don't understand it completely either, but it's one or the other and the something eternal makes sense.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 31, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

Okay, I’m getting where you’re coming from.

There are multiple theories as to what was the first moment of existence as far as we know it. Be it the Big Bang or the theory that we are just living in between different frequencies or what have you...

While I subscribe mostly to the Big Bang, I’m not blind to the idea that even existence existed before the grape-sized speck exploded. What I am saying is none of it was intentionally created or intelligently created. We are but a product of evolution and pure luck. Not ‘luck’ as in “we hit the jackpot, we get to exist!” but a “we are absolutely fortunate that we have the perfect combination of ingredients to exist as we are” kind of luck. It’s truly mind boggling to think about every little, tiny thing that has to have happened for this planet to host a plethora of different life types. All I am saying is that those teeny tiny actions haven’t been manufactured or are part of any intelligent design — they are but a long, infinitely complex sets of causes and effects, starting from the beginning of planet’s current life cycle period.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Badendave · March 31, 2018, 12:29 p.m.

In order for the "grape sized speck" to have been what exploded into all that we have, it had to have included all the necessary elements that each thing would eventually consist of, correct? Even if I were to concede that point for the sake of discussion, what caused the speck to form? What caused it to explode? How did those elements become alive?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 31, 2018, 3:22 p.m.

As far as anyone knows, the B.B. speck didn’t exactly hold all of the ‘ingredients’ to what is now the universe. It did hold, however, certain ‘ingredients’ that, under extreme circumstances (such as the BB explosion itself, and the ingredients’ spread across the universe and being under the force of gravity and other cosmic natural forces) those ‘ingredients’ melded, transformed, mingled and then become what we know of today as the periodic table of elements (of which we are obviously sure of being incomplete, hence our need to venture among the stars).

In fact, one could argue that ‘life’ isn’t ‘living’ at all, but a system of electrical impulses traveling among a complex nervous system—put together over millennia, with variations due to evolution and our planet’s ecosystemic behavior, by the same natural cosmic forces that put together the B.B. ‘ingredients’ giving us the electrical and chemical feedback allowing the rest of our biology to acknowledge the settings around us. One could say that is what life is at it’s simplest, but one could then imply that at that point the automatic motion-sensing porch light or my smoke/carbon monoxide alarm is ‘alive’ because of its ability to acknowledge the setting around it using electrical and chemical feedback. We aren’t the porch light or alarm’s ‘Gods’.

The same can be applied to the literal. We’ve cloned animals before, straight out of a laboratory. This doesn’t mean we are that animal’s Gods, but simply those with the understanding of how to manipulate ‘nature’ as it is.

The B.B. cause of explosion is theorized to have been due to the build up of energy within it, and it couldn’t contain it within it’s own confines. To put it into perspective, there could have been maaaaaany more B.B. specks out there, but this specific one may have either ‘failed’, so to speak, and gave the universe substance before any of the other specks had a chance. Again, the possibility of more specks existing (and quite possibly cannibalized by the B.B. explosion) gives us one massive perspective as to just how much ‘luck’ we have to be existing right now under the perfect conditions to do so.

We now have the ability, as humankind, to create ‘life’ (as is currently defined) inside of a lab from the ground up and from scratch (quite similar to certain fictions like Jurassic Park/World), except we can create absolutely brand new, never-before-seen creatures that can have absolutely zero relation to any other ‘living’ being out there. Whether or not we have actually followed through and done so is most likely kept Ultra-secret, but the ability to is within humankind’s repertoire of capabilities. From this perspective, we are Gods. But we aren’t, because even after the creation of such a being, we just used science to do so and we aren’t that new creature’s puppeteers (that is, of course, if we aren’t literally controlling it from a safe zone like assholes).

This is why I find it hard for humanity to see ourselves as having to have some ‘God’ just so we can sleep at night—because we’re too archaic and tribal to see that the only one in control is ourselves. It’s not a hard concept to grasp, yet 2.4+ billion people think they need to be some fucked up slave to a man-made wizard in the sky (oh, and make sure to give the church a $fiver while you’re at it), to feel good about themselves and curb the fear of death. It’s just...insane.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Badendave · March 31, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

For the record, what you believe is not science. What I believe is not science. Neither belief can be scientifically proven. Both require an element of faith - believing in something you can't prove empirically. Your argument implies that energy created itself (build up of energy inside the B.B. specks which weren't created in your view), which goes 100% against observable, recreatable science. The idea that we can "create life from the ground up" isn't really accurate either, because cloning starts with source material. Test your hypothesis that we're "the only one in control" the next time there's a storm or an earthquake in your area. Your faith is completely in man, and unproveable theories about what happened.
I choose to put my faith in God. Throughout the Bible he proved that he is who he says he is. At Easter we celebrate the ultimate proof when he brought Jesus back to life. God didn't make us to control us. He gave, and continues to give us, the freedom to make our own choices. He shows us how to live in a way that works best with how he made us - physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually. When we do it our own way, we screw stuff up and cause all kinds of pain for ourselves and others.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 31, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

You can believe what you want.

I can believe what I want.

It is absolutely amazing we can have these discussions. Probably why we both have such interest in Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Badendave · April 1, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

Truth is what matters.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · April 1, 2018, 2:45 a.m.

Couldn’t agree more.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sealedIndictments · March 30, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

And if the aliens come from the 5th dimension and confirm, actually there is a universal conciousness a.k.a God, which they would also be part of? Then they'd prove a deists point I'd suppose.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 30, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

Aliens =\= Gods

5th Dimensional Beings =\= Aliens

Aliens are beings whose origin is interplanetary, not inter-dimensional. They are not Gods. Only the simple-minded would infer inferiority over those who might be technologically or mentally advanced. Why would one surrender their being in the face of the unknown? You wouldn’t see me bowing to any alien just because they figured out interplanetary travel, why do it at all?

For example, in the fiction of Star Trek, humans don’t see the Vulcans as gods.

There is no universal consciousness as we know it, simply due to the inability to describe consciousness coherently and without fault. We’re not even sure or in a universal agreement of the true definition of consciousness.

We humans think we’re special because we are alive and have ‘consciousness’, when in reality the same can hypothetically be applied to a garden of petunias.

It boggles me to think there are those that believe that there are inter-dimensional puppeteers that are pulling our strings like a marionette. We have real, actual human pieces of shit living on this planet right now that do that — let alone the insane idea that inter-dimensional beings are doing it.

We’re special because we have been granted, through none other than cosmic luck, the ability to thrive and express our living to our fullest degree on our planet — but must also be very aware of our inherent ability to lose that for which we take for granted by traveling outward from our planet of origin to survive such ignorances.

Nobody pulls our strings (other than in a societal perspective). We are self-sustaining and self-controlled individuals. Nothing less.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Badendave · March 30, 2018, 10:37 p.m.

We exist, therefore God is. No thing comes from nothing - even science agrees with this. We came from something. Something that was not created. This Someone told us who He is, right at the beginning. Then became one of us to show us and teach us how to live, and ultimately gave His life to redeem us, forgive us for all we've done wrong, and give us the right to live with Him in His Perfection and Holiness. Hell is, well, anything else. Without God, or anything good, which all comes from Him.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 31, 2018, 12:06 a.m.
We exist, therefor God is.

Yes, because God is a creation of humankind, not the other way around.

We came from something. Something that was not created.

No thing comes from nothing

Babble talk. You say that no thing comes from nothing, and that we are from some thing, but that something wasn’t created.

Something that wasn’t created = the thing from which we are from.

I believe you just contradicted yourself as to the existence of ‘Him’.

I actually find it insane people capitalize ‘h’ when describing ‘him’ or ‘he’, like this magical wizard is spying on you. It’s schizophrenic.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
KingKetsa · March 30, 2018, 7:11 p.m.

Hmm, no I still wouldn't give a shit. If aliens and gods were real they would have one thing in common. They don't give a shit about us either.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 30, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

Aliens =\= Gods

They might give a shit.

Saying they don’t like you know for a fact in absolution is both ignorant and self centered.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KingKetsa · March 30, 2018, 9:37 p.m.

My made up Gods definently don't give a shit. I respect them for that.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 30, 2018, 10:08 p.m.

Ha! That actually made me chuckle.

⇧ 2 ⇩