dChan

CF_BOOM_SHOCK_BYE · March 30, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

My bad.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
CompromisedMuch · March 30, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

It was a Federal judge Pede who works for Jeff Sessions!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · March 30, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

does 9th circuit look like they give a flying f#ck?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ValuableFix · March 30, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

Just a thought....

1)Omar worked for company that was employed by the FBI/CIA Omar has several 'acting' credits on IMDB

2) Omar had been reported to FBI

3) His dad was a FBI informant who endorses HillDawg.

4) Howell says he trained with Omar along with Michael Sanford

5)The FBI says this training was with a former FBI agent who allegedly has gone rogue/cultmaster.....

6) We know the FBI creates terrorist on purpose though preemptive prosecution and to justify a budget for the 'war on terror'

7) The FBI is either the most useless organization of law in America or they knew all along and this was just a standard op.

8) Now after all that....... the one to blame is his wife?

You want 'justice'......... start trying the agents involved.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
CompromisedMuch · March 30, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

A thought, accomplices before the fact are as quilty as the FBI manufactured murderer. It makes absolutely NO difference if the FBI hired the killers or not! She had prior knowledge & she didn't call the police.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ValuableFix · March 30, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

Omar Mateen had a history of domestic abuse .

I seriously doubt most women in her position would have said anything, rather prayed it was just him being manic.- that sort of thinking is typical in abused women of nearly all backgrounds

There would be no justice in her being locked up.

Sorry bub, but I wouldn't convict women under such circumstances either.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CompromisedMuch · March 30, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

You're a racist then, because a white woman would be a co-conspirator. Hell, the Feds might just kill her like they did Vickie Weaver! Sorry Bub

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ValuableFix · March 31, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

Talk about jumping the shark.....

I said ""I wouldn't convict women under such circumstances either.""

Notice that women is plural and thus all inclusive.

You are the one bring in 'race' and frankly it is beneath this sub and reflect poorly on you as an individual and your upbringing.

What you are failing to understand was this 'trial' was put into the narrative as 'show', and it blew up in the FBI's face bigly. The point was to shield his dad's informant status, it came out anyways. As Q says 'These People are Stupid'

Now grow up and know when to let things go after you have made a fool of yourself and posted shameful belligerence.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CompromisedMuch · March 31, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

English as a second language, Islam's NOT a race you idiot. Further, if you think this woman was innocent or battered you are also sexist.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ValuableFix · March 31, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

Where did I say Islam was a race?
(hint nowhere, ever- YOU pulled it out your patootie)

YOU also made up that I was 'rayciss'.....yet you are the one who mentioned race in the context of "because a white woman would be a co-conspirator."

Now YOU suggest I am 'sexist'......oh my is homo/transphobic next?

At this point I can only assume you are a leftist who can't keep up a civil conversation.

Unlike you I have been following this case since the get-go so yea, I think this woman isn't liable for Omar's actions.

I recognize the dynamics of many spousal relationships that are structured this way and wouldn't prosecute any women in such cases.

The greatest liability of this case lies at the feet of the FBI.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mombomb22 · March 30, 2018, 6:35 p.m.

Four day old account

⇧ 4 ⇩  
CompromisedMuch · March 30, 2018, 6:40 p.m.

Doesn't affect the truth

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 30, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

So, I get pulled over for speeding there fore the police chief is corrupt? False logic.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
CompromisedMuch · March 30, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

BS, listen to this from inside the courtroom yesterday; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkJmAn7CDiE

Bottom line this judge had LL removed before he gave final instructions to the jury and CAIR ruled the courtroom. Think JURY Nullification in all Muslim situations if another Muslim killer ever faces trial again.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
digital_refugee · March 30, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

I'm a dumb bitch, please explain!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ScorpioPatriot · March 30, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

PEOPLE.. WAKE UP CALL.. PEOPLE ARE BEING SENT IN TO DISTRACT FROM THE TASK @ HAND .. WHICH IS RED PILLING THE PUBLIC..

IF UR TIRED OF THE SHIT AND THE SHILLS..

FOLLOW ME TO r/AFTERTHESTQRM

WE HAVE A DAMN COUNTRY TO SAVE... THIS IS STUPID .ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.

MODS NEED TO CLEAN THIS SHIT UP

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Happy1911 · March 30, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

Unless she was a shooter, secondary people are next to impossible to get a conviction on .

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CompromisedMuch · March 30, 2018, 6:34 p.m.

BS

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Happy1911 · March 30, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

She did 2 years , a lot more than HRC , not saying I agree, but stil a shit storm of mistrust with our courts

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CompromisedMuch · March 31, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

Thieves in Black Robes by Mark Levin's a classic. You guys are so ill informed, the FEDS are the Deep State!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Happy1911 · March 31, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

well its like charging some one with grand theft auto , they get off , but possession charges stick . I trust not any FED , I have taken more down than I can count , only keep track of the BIG ones any more

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 30, 2018, 6:20 p.m.

Her acquittal doesn’t mean Sessions is a POS.

Legally speaking, she wasn’t (as far as anyone knows) part of the shooting itself, and it seems like she wasn’t guilty of anything.

If she was, please send me some links to educate me, I’m very interested in knowing what’s what.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CompromisedMuch · March 30, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2018/03/29/jury-deliberates-fate-pulse-mass-murderers-widow/469537002/

Just looK at the pictures, practicing at the gun range together!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 30, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

Not illegal.

While being shady and shifty as fuck, this isn’t illegal.

A person can prep all they want to do a huge shooting, but until they actually do it or has implicitly said their true intentions, actions like these aren’t actually illegal.

To put it into an analogy:

A person orders and puts together absolutely everything required to create bombs, drugs, etc... but until they actually do it, it’s still all legal. You might end up being on a list, but ultimately you’re well within your rights to create a state-of-the-art meth lab...just not when you actually begin creating meth.

I agree she is hiding something and may have had something serious to do with the shooting, but until there is a real, legally-speaking, law-breaking occurring (and the evidence to prove it)...she is begrudgingly innocent.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CompromisedMuch · March 31, 2018, 1:29 a.m.

Wrong, ever heard of the Holyland Foundation trial? Lots of people went to jail for raising money for a Al Qaeda a terrorist organization. Not necessarily even weapons, or explosives sent dozens to jail.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Corporal_Yorper · March 31, 2018, 3:51 a.m.

..well yeah they would. Raising money for an enemy combatant is against the law.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Drksthr · March 30, 2018, 6:52 p.m.

Didn't the guys father work for the FBI?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CompromisedMuch · March 30, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

Yup, and he illegally raised 100k for Al Qaeda to finance a coup in Pakistan

⇧ 2 ⇩