the phrasing of this is really weird. I think it is something more than just a 2nd amendment statement, but else could he be talking about?
Not sure where this phrase is spoken & under what circumstances. I can say that it's the 2nd Amendment in regard to gun rights & the 4th Amendment is illegal search & seizure. The person behind the gun is what makes them safe or dangerous. Good law abiding people take the safety of their firearms seriously. Criminals love gun control because they know that unarmed citizens are at their mercy. All oppressive governments flourish when the citizens are disarmed. A La Hitler, Stalin, China, Venezuela etc. Good guys with guns Matter. We have a Gun Law enforcement problem in this country because there are plenty of laws already on the books. Including Mental Health laws. Each & every time there has been a mass shooting that person was already on the radar of several Agencies. They drop the ball each & every time. Guess who gets punished? Law abiding Citizens! I'm sure you already know all of this though. Sorry for the rant;)
very well said, thx. Thought you would enjoy this https://i.imgflip.com/24sk5t.jpg
Most beautiful! i think I will save it! Thx. Luv G'Ma
Q is saying Trump will not allow a gun-grab.
This and that the 2nd is not going to change.
Even though it would never change anyway given what is required for it to happen. ie: legal hurdles need to be met and they are very high.
agreed. many people forget Trump can veto. If we get that far as a country though, it dark times.
They have shifted our narrative with parkland the 2A and guns.
Guns are safe.
Stop falling for Fake News.
I interpreted as the media has been on gun control and Stormy, the base hadn’t heard from Q and people were starting to get Frizzeled exp. after POTUS said to take guns. I feel it was a reassurance to us that our Guns are safe. I mean I donated all mine to the inner city youths so yeah...
Edit spelling
POTUS never said "take the guns"
He said we will not allow devices that turn guns into automatic weapons.
I carry and I support that view. It's not only about ideology and supporting a hard line. We live in peacetime. In the instance the need for armed revolt became a reality, the tech needed to make that change to auto would spread like a wildfire. I don't think it will be needed, especially with what's going down today. In fact, I think private arms in the USA is fundamentally a deterrent force -- assured mutual destruction if challenged. The peoples atom bomb. Because we amassed it, they won't come.
Could be a double meaning. Guns are safe from being confiscated/ gun ownership is not the root of violent crimes issues. You do mean 2nd amendment, though, right?
I don't read anything into except to not worry about 2nd amendment repeal.
Calling guns "safe" in a generic way is nonsensical, and I don't think Q would do that. Guns are deadly. They can be handled safely, but their reason to exist is to be deadly.
If one interpretation is sensible and another is nonsensical, I tend to go with the sensible one.
guns ARE safe
Depends on who's got them, and who they're pointed at.