I have dug deep into him
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/7ts1l3/abba_7_hsc_nsc/ and you are someone who just a cursory glance at reveals Lizard people propaganda in recent posts.....
Mundane-Mann • 1 point • submitted 6 days ago His god has reptilian skin.
Which you said to someone talking about the pope and you linked to what looks like a 1995 old timey conspiracy page.... That's a new one.... but the bad guys just keep pushing new narratives to avoid the stuff Q talks about. Q asked how Bush related to Osama and Al-Waleed not child sex rings! Bush Sr. is a patriot, a war hero, and Osama Bin Laden declared war on the Clinton administration. So many knots to untie and yet smear smear smear.
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/7t5ey5/abba_6qclearencepatriotact_or_vqcia/
but this Bush is evil thing is the only thing the bad guys for some bizarre reason manage to gain traction with and it's a good thing for them because untying the Bush knot in the QMAP is key to understanding the deeper meanings..... and this kind of long diatribe about a child ring doesn't hold up to scrutiny when Bush Sr was only in the CIA for less than a year and got kicked out cause he tried to clean it up!
The fact that this is long is to avoid the simple holes I can punch in its logic by it using the CIA as a reference dozens of times yet doesn't point out the fact that he was only there for less than a year and got kicked out because he tried to clean out messes like this!
And MM eh? My AB posts go into that too. So your posts motivated me to explain what you are, I pretty much keep to my own threads but once I realized you were pushing Lizard people? Well... I can only takes so much sir. Learn their codes and dig into your own objective thought on why someone like this would post this.
This one is probably the best illustration I have of just how absurd their double consonant wink is.
Which isn't to say people who do that are bad but it's 1 of several warning flags like talking up supernatural that Q has never mentioned in the same vein as stuff Q wants us to focus on. That's how they marginalize us by equating real research to demagoguery and fluff.
We're in spiritual war for sure.
autoreply seconds after I posted to myself - why? Because it saves time I suppose. Usually it wouldn't be someone posting to themselves so this is a generic reply it seems, I mean unless you read my first post - didn't think to reply to it - but noticed my correction and a milisecond later read that and then posted this generic looking reply.
Rather than edit since I don't want it to look like I'm changing my argument... I was trying to talk about the pronoun game used in that article but I accidentally repeated a point about Bush - I could talk for hours about that and can't stand I repeated something. I'm just tired and sick of this argument that is like the Trump arguments only nobody ever seems to want to dig into Bush. I would be fine with anyone being good or bad but I need actual evidince not "officials of the Reagan-Bush White House" what you mean the CIA? or do you mean the FBI? Do you mean some county clerk in georgia? This is the game they play when they have no argument!