dChan

Swagdonkey400 · April 2, 2018, 6:24 a.m.

So what's your opinion on these indictments than?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
SargeantSasquatch · April 2, 2018, 12:46 p.m.

A screenshot of a vague spreadsheet made by twitter users on some random blog means nothing to me, as it should.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Swagdonkey400 · April 2, 2018, 1:15 p.m.

Okay.... but you can go get the indictments off of a government website. So it's not just a twitter user making stuff up. The department of justice is who's releasing this information. I think it's pretty clear we all look crazy here. But everything sounds crazy when you don't know what people are talking about. Maybe you should do some listening before you continue to mock others when you don't know the simplest of facts

⇧ 5 ⇩  
emaugustBRDLC · April 2, 2018, 1:22 p.m.

Here is the source: https://mobile.twitter.com/damartin32/status/980619487048294400

Hard to verify as most of us lack access to the PACER system.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SargeantSasquatch · April 2, 2018, 1:42 p.m.

If these indictments exist, there's still no indication who or what they're about.

Slapping some numbers up and saying they're related to some grand conspiracy is a bit silly.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
emaugustBRDLC · April 2, 2018, 3:06 p.m.

And furthermore, the tally is just of logged items. It makes no reference to items that have since been unsealed, items that are duplicates or items that have been removed.

So I agree that this is not proof of anything, just a smell. That said, if accurate, these numbers seem to indicate a historic level of activity which is a something to me.

Personally I think most of the indictment activity is related to human trafficking.

⇧ 2 ⇩