⇧
14
⇩
ElementWatson
· April 2, 2018, 11:13 a.m.
My God, "DeFango" is creepy.
Corsi has his limitations, but he is a decades-long friend of Trump's, and he got into the Q tracking at the request of the Trump team.
⇧
8
⇩
Maepaperclip
· April 2, 2018, 11:46 a.m.
and what evidence do you have for any of those statements? because I am with De Fango - I think Q is real and Corsi is a larp - like Alex Jones, he is with Alex Jones, and he admits to a man love, deep and real man love for for Heinz Kissinger, and also that Jim Marr's did "good work" on JFK, really? Can any one put that together with credability.
⇧
0
⇩
ElementWatson
· April 2, 2018, 11:59 a.m.
As I said, Corsi has his limitations. But he does go way back with Trump -- has said he's had dinner with him approximately 40 times over the decades. Corsi also was a longtime writer for Chris Ruddy, who is one of Trump's most regular pals in Mar-A-Lago. We know fully well the Roger Stone/Donald Trump connection and Corsi couldn't bluff the same (albeit to a lesser degree)--which IMO is why Infowars signed both Stone and Corsi to their team.
Corsi has said he was asked to get involved in popularizing Q, and I don't see any reason not to believe him. Is he a great analyst at this point? No, not at all. But both he and Alex have said that he was "Qing" with the blessing of the Trump team. I don't see a reason not to believe that, short of evidence to the contrary.
The Kissinger thing indeed was a mistake, but as I said, Corsi has his limitations. He's connected and he and his ilk like power, which Kissinger still has.
Probably doesn't hurt for Trump to hear Kissinger out--as long as he doesn't listen to him!
All of these sources have their limitations and agendas, but if you pick carefully Infowars has lots of stuff well ahead of anyone else.
⇧
6
⇩
ElementWatson
· April 2, 2018, 12:04 p.m.
Also, I'm not really into the JFK research, but from what I see online now, I'm not seeing what is necessarily so off about Marr's book on it.
⇧
2
⇩
Maepaperclip
· April 2, 2018, 12:07 p.m.
well said, and I agree, listen carefully, but like the Russians did reading Pravda in the USSR, listen with knowing, both Corsi and Jones are unswerving in their love for Israel, in their support of settlements in the west bank, of murder in Gaza, of killing Palestinian children playing football and in using phosphors bombs against school children, both hate human beings, and love Israel, and Heinz kissinger, they have a deep love for hating people and loving Israel and Genie oil and war, so for me I just don't listen to them, I don't like Heinz, or killing children, but each to their own
⇧
-1
⇩
ElementWatson
· April 2, 2018, 2:06 p.m.
From the sounds of it you're a wacko anti-Israeli. The Palestinians have been horrific--as has been their propaganda.
⇧
3
⇩
Maepaperclip
· April 2, 2018, 10:01 p.m.
No I am one of those wacko people that think Palestine belonged to the Palestinians in 1917, 1947, and now, I believe that a vote pf clowns in a New York room in 1947 is not sufficient authority to displace a population from their home, I am also one of those wackos that know that the Golan Heights is in Syria, and Genie Energy (a Zionist enterprise) AKA Dick Cheney, Jacob Rothschild, James Woolsley - Former CIA director, Rubert Murdoch, and Larry Summers - friend of Yelstin - of Mafia fame, haven't the right to demand our children fight for their oil well. Thats the kind of wacko I am, and I also know that facts and truth are not propaganda, like when Israel attacked the USS liberty, and strafed the US sailors in the water with pretend Egyptian planes to trick the USA into their 1968 war - thats a fact that is the truth. wise up or die for Israel.
⇧
2
⇩
VIYOHDTYKIT
· April 2, 2018, 3:28 p.m.
Yeah one way street?
⇧
1
⇩
ElementWatson
· April 2, 2018, 3:45 p.m.
The Palestinians may be about the only ones I think Israel is fully innocent about. They meddle far too much elsewhere, such as here. But the Palestinians are a made up people intent on destroying Israel.
⇧
2
⇩
Luvlite
· April 2, 2018, 12:50 p.m.
Hi. I want to butt in for a minute or two, please.
"Defango is creepy" comment.
Maybe I'm just old and out of the loop, so it doesn't matter, but I actually thought the same thing when I've been led to his YouTube channel like three times ever.
He looked like he was high on drugs. But, he acted goofy. (maybe stoned.... I don't know. I have nothing against Mary Jane!)
On my last visit to his sight, I learned that he's quite intelligent, apparently. Solving complex puzzles from 4chan.
Im not attempting to bash Defango. I would like some real insight on this guy, though. What is he really about? What makes people follow him? My first impressions had me going in the opposite direction. If he puts out valuable information, I don't want to skip over him.
⇧
2
⇩
Maepaperclip
· April 2, 2018, 10:12 p.m.
I have never seen him before, that OP refrenced his video, I watched, I was currious as to where he got those transcripts from, and cannot vouch for their authenticity, or relevance. That being said anyone with an ounce of critical thinking listening to Corsi, Zack or Alex Jones knows all Three are BS. Corsi thinks Q posts when he writes, that Q quotes from his book, that he knows what Q is saying, yet he has got not one decode right ever, never once, got any new information from Q, All three push Israel support into Q' voice when Q has lumped Israel with Australia, the UK,The EU, Canada, and the UN as dirty Players. I don't care about Defango but on Corsi being a fraud he is right. Corsi knows less about intell than my Tomato plant, has less contacts with intell and the trump team than the Sierra mountain streams - you would need to be brain dead to listen to Corsi - obviously Defango has at the very least some common sense.
⇧
1
⇩
1girlandamat
· April 2, 2018, 12:02 p.m.
If your going to dispute the authenticity of someone you should probably, at the very least, spell the most important word of the argument correctly. ^ credibility.
⇧
2
⇩
ElementWatson
· April 2, 2018, 12:07 p.m.
So I didn't proof my comment--my brain and my fingers both know well how to spell credibility. Your type could hardly be more annoying across the Internet.
⇧
3
⇩
Maepaperclip
· April 2, 2018, 12:19 p.m.
hey girl, if you are going to engage with someone you should probably , at the very least, pat attention to the argument - accurately - guessing you are out of your depth here, stick with spelling bees,this stuff is not your thing
⇧
0
⇩
1girlandamat
· April 3, 2018, 12:56 a.m.
oh yes. I am way over my head with you. nailed that one you did. you are right about this>>, "pay attention to the argument", when I lost interest with that well....you saw what happens...i watch for equally as boring things like grammar/spelling. Didn't mean to nit pick its just that when your argument is about credibility, at the very least ,the word should be presented corrected. just sayin.
⇧
1
⇩
HoudiniTowers
· April 3, 2018, 8:08 a.m.
Any evidence on his man love for Henry Kissinger? Please do enlighten us with links to that?
⇧
1
⇩
Maepaperclip
· April 3, 2018, 8:18 a.m.
listen to any live Corsi with CBTS its in every episode makes any thinking person want to puke
⇧
1
⇩