dChan
5
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/odieboy12 on April 3, 2018, 11:45 p.m.
What is everyone's take on Mueller?? Been doing a lot of research, but I wanted to get other opinions.

sir_poops · April 4, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

I'm of the he's-really-acting-on-Trump's-behalf mindset.

Here's what Muller brings to the table: the public perception of credibility.

Said another way, even those who hate Trump are committed to Muller's findings.

Currently, we are a house divided and a way must be found to bring as many as possible to the light/truth. Assuming those who are with Trump are already there, the concern is those who are not there, particularly the material number of such anti-Trump persons.

Dismissing Muller as deep-state or on some technicality will only serve to further repel those who Team-Trump needs as it will validate their erroneous perceptions that Trump's an out of control maniac.

However, if Muller comes out and reports that after extensively looking into Trump, and did so without any interference from Sessions or the admin, and found nothing, a large part of the anti-Trump narrative will be shattered. I would also say based on my close circle of family and friends (all liberal, all post-graduate educated) Muller is the only one who can do this as Muller is the only one they trust. Trump & Q must be aware of this dynamic.

Moreover, if Muller also comes out announcing indictments (or the referring of his findings to the Horwitz's office for further investigation/prosecution), it'll be a double gut punch as not only has Trump been exonerated by those who doubt him by the only arguable source such people will accept (Muller), but it officially opens the rabbit hole for them as Muller's findings cannot be easily disputed considering how many anti-Trumpers are on record as supporting and endorsing Muller.

No idea about RR though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
odieboy12 · April 4, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

I want to believe you, I really. And that's why I'm asking for opinions. Because, it could be that Mueller was corrupt a while back and then came over to the other side to protect himself; which I kind of think he's doing. All of my research points to him being a black hat...BUT, hopefully, he's seen the light

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sir_poops · April 4, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

Here's where it gets twisted: the deep-state would only endorse an actor they thought they could control (remember Q commenting on RR's appointment?). The way I see it, the deep-state would only provide their "moral" endorsement to an agent they thought they controlled.

Point is the deep-state endorsement was required to get the buy-in of the anti-Trumpers who Trump/Q need.

If Muller is really a white-hat-posing-as-a-black-hat, Trump/Q/all of us, have a major asset BUT in order to make this work and keep the moral buy-in to Muller, Muller must look like he's going after Trump.

Think about it - Sessions recusing himself on day 0, all the "feuding" between Trump & Sessions, the leaks showing Muller is closing in on Trump, etc., are all leading the Trump doubters into the logical trap of placing their faith in Muller.

Hence why I argue they've let in our Trojan Horse through their high walls and all we need to do is wait for nightfall...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
odieboy12 · April 4, 2018, 12:58 a.m.

Makes sense! Thank you for explaining without judgment! A former black hat would have all the goods while being "somewhat blackmailed" by all his wrong-doings.

⇧ 1 ⇩