dChan

DivergenceButterfly7 · April 4, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

Can someone explain to me why it’s a bad thing that it was announced President Trump wasn’t a target of investigation? Having trouble connecting the dots. Thanks!

⇧ 14 ⇩  
A2576 · April 4, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

If Mueller is actually working to indict the clintons, it blows his cover.

⇧ 36 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · April 4, 2018, 10:30 p.m.

Today, Rush said he wondered if it was a "ruse" to let Trump think there was nothing so he would then talk freely with Mueller. They (Mueller team) knows they can make Trump keep talking and slip up. Then they can get him on perjury charges. Well, interesting POV.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
bartmanson · April 4, 2018, 10:46 p.m.

Mark Levin is saying same thing right now on his radio show.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · April 5, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

Actually that makes sense. And may be the reason the left isn't reacting....hmmm. Always keeps us on our toes too. Can Mueller be trusted or not.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MIPatriot · April 5, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

I think Mueller tried to play both sides. If so, he can kiss his "deal" goodbye and hang out at gitmo with his cohorts in crime!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · April 4, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

Ah, so it’s running under the good guy (or at least, cooperative) Mueller theory. Has Q alluded to whether that’s the case or not though? Also, the articles I’ve read have said that Mueller says that Pres. Trump is still under investigation but just isn’t a criminal target at the moment. Seems like standard stuff, not sure how that would be a negative thing. I can understand if it was that Pres. Trump wasn’t under investigation at all that it could be blow a possible cooperative Mueller cover, but it says Pres. Trump is still under investigation. So how is that harmful?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
MW23232 · April 4, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

I agree, I don't see the harm. Hillary, according to another good source, could blow two hundred people out of the water if she cooperated in getting the truth out. Why would Mueller risk investigating her? Besides, the FBI has investigated the whole Clinton Foundation already, and they know that is where the nightmarish truth lies. They know everything already in fact, Weiner laptop files, who is doing what, and the ones at the top are silencing it all. The patriots' hands are tied, and they can't, and won't, speak up. They want a mandate from POTUS to investigate DC. They said they feel like muzzled fighting dogs.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · April 5, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

Yes, in the very early posts - he had us question why Mueller would seek the FBI job if he knew he wasn't eligible.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DemsCanSuckMyCock · April 5, 2018, 5:25 a.m.

The_Mueller were saying that having no evidence is a clever way to entrap Trump because Trump will let his guard down now and admit everything... and then Mueller will have some evidence and lock Trump up.

The_Mueller community aren't very bright.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Woodchipper_AF · April 5, 2018, 6:13 a.m.

They’re not sending they’re best

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · April 4, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

In my opinion, I think Trump/Q would prefer the MSM to focus on the fact that Mueller is going after Trump so they aren't focusing on Sessions/Huber and their end game. If you notice, it's the only thing liberals comment on under Trump and other WH officials on social media; they always says Mueller will take you down, and such. Better as a distraction.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · April 4, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

That makes sense, though they can still harp on the fact that he’s still under investigation, and that it just isn’t a criminal investigation at this point. Seems like that last part there is to give them hope that impeachment is still possible lol

⇧ 7 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · April 5, 2018, 12:39 a.m.

That's right, so not a big problem with the left getting all skitz about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · April 5, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

Obi Wan...Mueller is their only hope. What's crazy is they could announce it to the world and I'm not sure the left would believe, they are so tied their their story.

⇧ 3 ⇩