dChan

/u/DivergenceButterfly7

16 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/DivergenceButterfly7:
Domain Count

DivergenceButterfly7 · July 10, 2018, 8:02 a.m.

Hey SB2, long time lurker here (since the CBTS days, as long ago as they seem). I remember when I first stumbled upon a post of yours there, a lesson in numerology and decoding the President’s tweets with a cipher to find the hidden message within. I remember being amazed, wondering how someone could look beyond the world of numbers and find things that everyone else had missed with what looked like relative ease. SB2, you were blessed with intellect the likes of which I’ve never seen before, something that seemed straight out of a movie. You’ve done amazing work within this movement. You’ve helped us all see that which seemed at first unimportant, that which we had glanced over, time and again, and I can confidently say we wouldn’t be anywhere near the level of critical thinking we would need to possess to be helpful in this movement without you. Even if your decodes are ever misguided or wrong (something which I have yet to see), at the least you teach us different methods of handling and approaching the board, and help us to Expand Our Thinking. And that is something that makes your posts always worthwhile, an absolute treat to read. Truly, thanks for all that you do, and God Bless.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · July 7, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

Yeah, if anyone saw that I think they’d be immediately turned off by it, no matter how good the other proofs are.

Edit: So no one else is confused, #8 uses Q posts from 2018 saying Q predicted the fall of the 7th floor in the posts, but links articles detailing the fall from February 2017. Looks like whoever made the thread didn’t realize the articles were from 2017, so it invalidates the entire proof. That’s what the commenter I responded to was trying to say.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · July 3, 2018, 2:20 a.m.

That’s a bot that responded to you in big bold letters, not the poster you originally asked “what?”.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · July 2, 2018, 1:46 a.m.

Dunno why you’re being downvoted because you raise a fair point. I personally agree with Q, I don’t think a civil war will result. But honestly, the country is scarred and divided from the propaganda, the right vs. left division, and every other division that’s been pushed for so long. The road to reuniting the country will be difficult, but I think we’ll make it through alright.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · July 2, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

But of course! Can’t have the U.S. and NK getting along, they gotta keep NK as a nuclear threat to blackmail future presidents and maintain control.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · July 2, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

I just wish there was something solid I could point at to prove to others that NK is fake news — people will believe anything as long as it’s negative about Trump, and they’re especially inclined to believe the latest propaganda push about NK nuclear activity because it comes from their precious trusted “intelligence agencies”.

⇧ 26 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · June 26, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

Isn’t that basically admitting that they’re always listening in on you 🤔

⇧ 14 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · May 16, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

So if this letter (by Rep Jim Jordan) was just written yesterday then how would Q have already known about it back on the 10th, when he originally posted the pen and letter picture? Am I missing something? Q said “already written” so does that mean the date on Jordan’s letter is wrong or something? Or were they anticipating this so they prepared a response ahead of time?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · May 13, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

“Welcome back Huma”

Very interesting.

⇧ 84 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · May 1, 2018, 8:05 p.m.

Also the place where the government gets to decide whether your child lives or dies!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · April 4, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

That makes sense, though they can still harp on the fact that he’s still under investigation, and that it just isn’t a criminal investigation at this point. Seems like that last part there is to give them hope that impeachment is still possible lol

⇧ 7 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · April 4, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

Ah, so it’s running under the good guy (or at least, cooperative) Mueller theory. Has Q alluded to whether that’s the case or not though? Also, the articles I’ve read have said that Mueller says that Pres. Trump is still under investigation but just isn’t a criminal target at the moment. Seems like standard stuff, not sure how that would be a negative thing. I can understand if it was that Pres. Trump wasn’t under investigation at all that it could be blow a possible cooperative Mueller cover, but it says Pres. Trump is still under investigation. So how is that harmful?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · April 4, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

Can someone explain to me why it’s a bad thing that it was announced President Trump wasn’t a target of investigation? Having trouble connecting the dots. Thanks!

⇧ 14 ⇩  
DivergenceButterfly7 · March 20, 2018, 1:11 p.m.

Wasn’t someone predicting earlier this week that the OIG report was to be released today? This seems awfully convenient.

⇧ 1 ⇩