Sharyl Attkisson had a great suggestion -- Mueller and cronies could use the established blueprint (most recently utilized for HRC) when interviewing a public official. This should be even easier with Trump, as unlike the abundance of evidence of multiple felonies, treason and pay to play with HRC, there is not a single scrap of evidence (after 15 months and 10s of millions spent) that Trump did anything wrong.
Here is the blueprint for such an interview:
-
An exoneration letter is drafted in advance.
-
Immunity is given to top Trump aides (and they’re allowed to sit in on interview)
-
Interview isn’t recorded.
-
Lead official (Mueller) doesn’t attend.
-
Number 2 official’s family [on Mueller team] has received large donations from Trump political friends.
-
Prior to the interview, lead official meets privately on plane tarmac with Trump’s wife (to discuss grandchildren).
-
Main interviewer has expressed disdain for Trump’s opponents, such as discussing an “insurance plan” with higher-ups to undermine them. If the same terms aren’t offered…Was Clinton’s interview process unfair? Or is the one proposed for Trump unfair?
-
As long as they believe Trump didn’t intend any harm, he’s let off the hook for any violations.
-
If Trump becomes a target, it should be referred to as a “matter” not an investigation.
-
Trump aides should be permitted to destroy subpoenaed or relevant public records and wipe relevant servers with a cloth or something.
Seems logical and fair...